- From: Henri Fallon <henri@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2002 22:05:12 -0500
- To: Terje Bless <link@pobox.com>
- Cc: W3C Validator <www-validator@w3.org>
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 03:51:17AM +0100, Terje Bless wrote: > Note that, AFAICT, what you have there is _not_ extraneous "XML > Declarations"! There can be only one such and the grammar restricts where > in the document it may appear. The later instances are merely generic > Processing Instructions with the target "xml". If I get you well, you are saying that those lines are not to be called "XML Declarations". My question was more whether they are supposed to be there are not : if not, should it be considered as a bug that the validator doesn't spot it ? if they're not invalid, should the validator issue a warning ? I have not invented this bug, I actually had it on my home website where I had many xml processed through an xslt parser and had them everywhere. Thanks for your clarification. -- Henri Fallon - W3C Webmaster MIT Room NE43-340 Tel:617-258-8143 mailto:henri@w3.org
Received on Monday, 2 December 2002 22:05:15 UTC