Christoph Päper wrote: > [application/xhtml+xml] <URL:http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-validator/2002Feb/0066.html> <URL:http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-validator/2002Feb/0060.html> > > Ok, so wešre now to the point where what we get is known to be generic XML. > > Now what? Can I go ahead and assume SGML-type semantics for the XML > > Application in question? Will it have a nice easy flattended DTD I can > > expect SP to handle? Or does this particular brand of application/xhtml+xml > > require XML Schema Validation? Namespaces? Do I need something that groks > > M12N? What are the Character Encoding semantics? What are the higher-level > > semantics so I can implement pretty-but-not-formal features (aka. > > łlinting˛)? (Huh, what's that for an encoding?) -- Sascha »SCommmodore« Claus WBG Kontakt, L. E., Germany mailto:SC_LE@gmx.de PGP-key:0x9E095CA2 The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter. (Sir Winston Leonard Spencer "Winnie" Churchill)Received on Friday, 5 April 2002 15:06:25 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 1 October 2009 14:48:44 GMT