It would be nice if the validator would also accept pages with the content type "application/xhtml+xml" since it's RFCed for a while now. In my case I generate two versions of every (static) page: * a HTML version with .html file extension and delivered as text/html and * XHTML with .xhtml and application/xhtml+xml. Both should be valid, the latter well formed, too, but by now I can't validate them online. Christoph PäperReceived on Thursday, 4 April 2002 09:55:29 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 20 September 2007 14:26:13 GMT