W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-validator@w3.org > September 2001

Re: Valid HTML?

From: Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 16:13:18 -0700
Message-Id: <a05100301b7bb105bd021@[198.173.164.123]>
To: JAMESICUS@aol.com, www-validator@w3.org
What doesn't look like valid HTML?  Closing and opening tags for
HEAD and BODY are optional.  (In HTML, at least. Not in XHTML.)

--Kynn


At 6:51 PM -0400 2001/9/04, JAMESICUS@aol.com wrote:
>Extract of a message from a friend:
>
>I'm curious about this site .....
>
>http://bw.org/
>
>I look at the code, and it doesn't look like valid HTML,
>actually, I don't know why it even works.
>
>BTW, I wasn't being critical of his code, (I probably
>should be), I just don't see how it works.
>
>I am also curious -- all comments welcome.
>
>James Pickering


-- 
Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com>
http://www.kynn.com/
Received on Tuesday, 4 September 2001 19:20:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 25 April 2012 12:13:59 GMT