On Tuesday, May 22, 2001, at 07:45 , Tomislav Grabic wrote: > I had a template validated by the service. The only warning was the > absence of a Doctype decleration. In IE and Netscape 4.08 (except a > little glitch) and NN 6 it looked good before, but then I pasted in > each of the three listed Doctypes. NN6 was completely ripped apart. I > don't understand why, but maybe somebody here understands why. The url; > http://www.iroke.de/templatetest.html See these results: <http://www.google.com/search?q=doctype+sniffing+quirks+sivonen&hl=en&lr=&safe= off&sa=G&scoring=d> While syntactically valid, your document is formatted according to a set of notions (tables for layout, spacer GIFs, BR runs, etc.) that is difficult or impossible to accommodate within the framework of W3C recommendations since 1996 at least. MacIE5, Netscape 6 (Mozilla), and WinIE6 take certain DOCTYPE declarations as a clue about the expectations of the author, and change their behaviors accordingly. DOCTYPEs referring to recent W3C-issued DTDs put these browsers into rendering modes that reward a more thorough embrace of CSS for document formatting. Have a look at, e.g., <http://glish.com/css/> for some pointers on escaping legacy formatting models. -- todd fahrnerReceived on Thursday, 24 May 2001 01:44:59 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 25 April 2012 12:13:58 GMT