W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-validator@w3.org > June 2001

Re: Icons for XHTML1.1

From: hunter <hunter@userfriendly.net>
Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2001 16:15:45 -0400
Message-ID: <3B3E3371.E88DA20D@userfriendly.net>
To: JAMESICUS@aol.com
CC: www-validator@w3.org, Ken Cotterill <ken@me.com.au>
bottom line is, its NOT validated against a DTD which isnt in the
namespace yet, cant be...thats the way it works...so that validation
means next to nothing IMHO

HTH
--
JAMESICUS@aol.com wrote:
> 
> In a message dated 6/30/01 7:05:22 AM US Mountain Standard Time,
> ken@me.com.au wrote:
> 
> > Go to http://ken.me.com.au/v3.html and click on the validation button at
> the
> > bottom. <snip>
> 
> Well, I am confused. The Validation you cite, Ken, contains the following
> caveat:
> 
> Document type: unknown with namespace http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml
> 
> I don't see how that signifies that your Document was Validated as XHTML 1.1.
> Could anyone explain this, please?
> 
> James Pickering
> Tucson, Arizona

-- 
Michael B. Weiner, Linux+, Linux+ SME
Systems Administrator/Partner
The UserFriendly Network (UFN)
--
Linux Registered User #94900	Have you been counted?
http://counter.li.org

PGP: 30 1D CC BA 30 30 63 35  CD 58 E0 89 A9 17 CC C0  8C 55 F7 72

.........    Escape the 'Gates' of Hell
  `:::'                  .......  ......
   :::  *                  `::.    ::'
   ::: .::  .:.::.  .:: .::  `::. :'
   :::  ::   ::  ::  ::  ::    :::.
   ::: .::. .::  ::.  `::::. .:'  ::.
...:::.....................::'   .::::..
--
Received on Saturday, 30 June 2001 16:12:22 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 25 April 2012 12:13:58 GMT