W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-validator@w3.org > June 2001

Re: Icons for XHTML1.1

From: Ken Cotterill <ken@me.com.au>
Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2001 05:41:52 +1000
Message-ID: <003001c1019c$b6b7a860$10a711cb@deimos>
To: <JAMESICUS@aol.com>, <www-validator@w3.org>

Yep, you're right.

It first says it's unknown (as you have below), then it says:

Below are the results of checking this document for XML well-formedness and validity. 

    No errors found! *
Congratulations, this document validates as the document type specified! (I don't have an icon for this one yet, sorry.) 

I added a lang="en" to the HTML tag.
It reports this is not a valid attribute.
So it appears to be correctly discerning between XHTML 1.0 Strict and XHTML 1.1

I ran it through http://www.htmlhelp.com/tools/validator/ which reported:

  a.. Level of HTML: XHTML 1.1 
Congratulations, no errors!

The namespace is as cited by W3C.

This suggests the validation is working correctly and the namespace recognition code has a problem.

That's about as far as I can run with this.


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: JAMESICUS@aol.com 
  To: www-validator@w3.org 
  Cc: Ken Cotterill 
  Sent: Sunday, July 01, 2001 5:01 AM
  Subject: Re: Icons for XHTML1.1

  In a message dated 6/30/01 7:05:22 AM US Mountain Standard Time, 
  ken@me.com.au wrote:

  > Go to http://ken.me.com.au/v3.html and click on the validation button at 
  > bottom. <snip> 

  Well, I am confused. The Validation you cite, Ken, contains the following 

  Document type: unknown with namespace http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml

  I don't see how that signifies that your Document was Validated as XHTML 1.1. 
  Could anyone explain this, please?

  James Pickering
  Tucson, Arizona
Received on Saturday, 30 June 2001 15:40:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 14:17:30 UTC