On Fri, 29 Jun 2001, Liam Quinn wrote: > There's nothing wrong with using the 8-bit ISO-8859-1 encoding of a letter > with an umlaut as long as you specify your charset as ISO-8859-1. but if you can, surely using available &entity; increases understandability for displays using other charsets? Even if they don't translate it but display it raw, the reader has a chance to figure out meaning. L. has been seeing a lot of &emdash; recently, as hundreds of years of typographic crud catch up with the web. <L.Wood@surrey.ac.uk>PGP<http://www.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/L.Wood/>Received on Saturday, 30 June 2001 12:11:46 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 1 October 2009 14:48:42 GMT