At 02:09 +0200 2001-06-23, Terje Bless wrote: >On 22.06.01 at 09:43, Stephanie Booth <steph@climbtothestars.org> wrote: > >>The link to "explanation" on validation errors is a great idea. It would >>also be very useful if the "explanation" page provided links to the >>recommendation for immediate problem look-up. > >Thanks for the suggestion! I'm not sure we can implement this completely, >but we can certainly improve it with fairly simple measures. A complete >implementation would have to track relevant clauses for each error from >each and every standard that we can validate against, but providing links >to the most common standards from the error explanations would be doable. I did it for the CSS validator. It's not implemented yet, but Philippe has a file with each error and a link to the right place in the spec. It will be possible to do it for HTML validator if we can control the output. -- Karl Dubost / W3C - Conformance Manager http://www.w3.org/QA/ --- Be Strict To Be Cool! ---Received on Monday, 25 June 2001 09:00:41 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 1 October 2009 14:48:42 GMT