W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-validator@w3.org > September 2000

Re: re-testing "fixed" file?

From: William Loughborough <love26@gorge.net>
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2000 13:31:52 -0700
Message-Id: <5.0.0.19.2.20000910132854.009d8b30@mail.gorge.net>
To: "Bjoern Hoehrmann" <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Cc: <www-validator@w3.org>
Thank you Bjoern. In fact I'm sure that there's a "caching server" at my 
ISP that did this. Another problem with such a setup is that when I'm 
making repeated uploads during re-writes of a file something (recursion?) 
causes the site to become unavailable to me even though someone from a 
different computer can get to the newly edited site!

At 10:24 PM 9/10/00 +0200, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
>* "William Loughborough" <love26@gorge.net> wrote:
>| So I try to validate a page and get an error notification, fix it and am
>| unable to try the corrected version because it apparently caches the
>| original report?
>
>This must be a problem on your side, e.g. there works a HTTP acceleration
>proxy in front of your website. The Validator doesn't use any proxy, if i've
>not missed something significant.
>
>But, i think a "Cache-Control: no-cache" should be sent by the validator, to
>ensure there aren't any problems (or the same thing in HTTP/1.0 syntax, since
>the used LWP version is a HTTP/1.0 client).
>
>regards,
>--
>Björn Höhrmann ^ mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de ^ http://www.bjoernsworld.de
>am Badedeich 7 ° Telefon: +49(0)4667/981ASK ° http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
>25899 Dagebüll # PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 # http://learn.to/quote +{i}
>     --- All I want for Christmas is well-formedness -- Evan Lenz ---


--
Love.
                 ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE
Received on Sunday, 10 September 2000 16:30:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 25 April 2012 12:13:54 GMT