W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-validator@w3.org > November 2000

Re: Validator option suggestion

From: Gerald Oskoboiny <gerald@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2000 13:48:06 -0500
To: W3C Validator <www-validator@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20001102134806.B948@w3.org>
On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 08:47:04AM -0500, Hugo Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 02, 2000, Terje Bless wrote:
> > >Yes, if a document is in a private space and it has a bunch of links in
> > >the same area, the link checker will report those links as 401's. This is
> > >because the link checker to check technical reports which are public.
> > 
> > But don't you proxy the auth request for the original document to the
> > browser? Why not cache that and attempt to use it for the relative links
> > within the same realm? The only time this would create a problem is with a
> > public document that links to private documents.
> That's an excellent point: 401's should be reported only if the realm is
> different from the one for the document checked.

One problem with this though is that there may be some 401s that
are a result of the draft being (temporarily) in member space,
and others that are actually links to other member-internal
resources that need to be reported.

How about an option that says "ignore 401s for resources that
have the same URI prefix as that being checked" or something?

Gerald Oskoboiny       <gerald@w3.org>  +1 613 261 6630
System Administrator   http://www.w3.org/People/Gerald/
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)      http://www.w3.org/
Received on Thursday, 2 November 2000 13:48:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 27 November 2015 11:01:12 UTC