W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-validator@w3.org > April 2000

RE: HTML 4.01 validator error

From: Kevin D. Berkheiser <kberk@bigfoot.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2000 18:45:51 -0400
To: <www-validator@w3.org>
Message-ID: <NCBBJFKBEKDJELDDCODLGEPJCCAA.kberk@bigfoot.com>
Think of XHTML 1 as HTML 5.  You would not be able to validate a HTML 4
document with an HTML 3.2 doctype.

Kevin Berkheiser


 -----Original Message-----
From: 	www-validator-request@w3.org [mailto:www-validator-request@w3.org]
On Behalf Of Keith Bowes
Sent:	Monday, April 03, 2000 02:48
To:	www-validator@w3.org
Subject:	Re: HTML 4.01 validator error

I was under the impression that valid XHTML isn't always valid HTML 4.01,
but rather you can fool HTML UAs into thinking the slash is a boolean
attribute (that's why, for compatibility, you can use white space before the
slash).  Since the HTML specs say that UAs should ignore attributes that
they don't recognize, there's no harm in it.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Russell Healy" <rushealy@yahoo.com>
To: <www-validator@w3.org>
Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2000 8:07 AM
Subject: HTML 4.01 validator error


Hello

I noticed that the HTML 4.01 validator incorrectly reports XML style empty
elements as erroneous. For example:

<HR /> is reported as an error but is actually correct.

I have assumed that HTML 4.01 accepts XML style empty elements. If not, this
raises the issue that XHTML 1.0 valid documents are not HTML 4.01 valid.

Regards

Russell Healy

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com
Received on Monday, 3 April 2000 18:40:25 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 25 April 2012 12:13:53 GMT