- From: B. Szyszka <bart@gigabee.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1999 20:14:05 -0400
- To: "Michael Gade" <michael@mgade.dk>, "Kynn Bartlett" <kynn@idyllmtn.com>, <www-validator@w3.org>
> My point was NOT if the document was "correct", but that it claimed to be > HTML 4.0. > If this kind of abuse is allowed, then people will loose the confidence they > should have that W3 can handle the HTML specs. If the document didn't have a doctype, how did you know most of it wasn't written in HTML 4.x Transitional, though? Not much difference between that and HTML 3.2. Either way, if the document doesn't validate against the doctype that it should have, then they're not being very honest. -- Bart Szyszka bart@gigabee.com ICQ:4982727 B Grafyx http://www.bgrafyx.com L.J.R. Engineering http://www.ljreng.com PHP Interest Group http://www.gigabee.com/pig/
Received on Tuesday, 28 September 1999 20:33:27 UTC