W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-validator@w3.org > September 1999

RE: Abuse of the W3 Logo

From: B. Szyszka <bart@gigabee.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1999 20:14:05 -0400
To: "Michael Gade" <michael@mgade.dk>, "Kynn Bartlett" <kynn@idyllmtn.com>, <www-validator@w3.org>
> My point was NOT if the document was "correct", but that it claimed to be
> HTML 4.0.
> If this kind of abuse is allowed, then people will loose the confidence they
> should have that W3 can handle the HTML specs.
If the document didn't have a doctype, how did you know most of it wasn't
written in HTML 4.x Transitional, though? Not much difference between that
and HTML 3.2. Either way, if the document doesn't validate against the
doctype that it should have, then they're not being very honest.

Bart Szyszka  bart@gigabee.com  ICQ:4982727
B Grafyx  http://www.bgrafyx.com
L.J.R. Engineering  http://www.ljreng.com
PHP Interest Group  http://www.gigabee.com/pig/
Received on Tuesday, 28 September 1999 20:33:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 14:17:25 UTC