- From: B. Szyszka <bart@gigabee.com>
- Date: Tue, 5 Oct 1999 22:47:01 -0400
- To: "Kynn Bartlett" <kynn@idyllmtn.com>
- Cc: "Gerald Oskoboiny" <gerald@w3.org>, <www-validator@w3.org>
> Isn't XHTML a proposed recommendation? It doesn't make sense to issue > icons for something that has not cleared the W3C process yet. If I can validate the code against XHTML at the W3C validator, then I'm assuming that an icon that represents me taking that process is within the boundaries of logic. At least that's from my perspective. Yours is obviously different. Sorry. -- Bart Szyszka bart@gigabee.com ICQ:4982727 B Grafyx http://www.bgrafyx.com L.J.R. Engineering http://www.ljreng.com PHP Interest Group http://www.gigabee.com/pig/
Received on Tuesday, 5 October 1999 23:05:31 UTC