Re: doctype placement

From: Liam Quinn (
Date: Mon, Jul 26 1999

Message-Id: <>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 1999 21:22:39 -0400
From: Liam Quinn <>
Subject: Re: doctype placement 

At 08:43 PM 26/07/99 -0400, Liam Quinn wrote:
>At 08:27 PM 26/07/99 -0400, Russell Steven Shawn O'Connor wrote:
>>On Mon, 26 Jul 1999, Liam Quinn wrote:
>>> This has the unfortunate side effect of allowing unrecognized DOCTYPEs to
>>> go by without an error message while SP assumes HTML4.dtd.
>>Sorry, I don't fully understand this.  Can you give some examples to
>>illustrate this?
>When you use
>DOCTYPE html HTML4.dtd
>in your catalog and try to validate a document with an unrecognized DOCTYPE
>such as
><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//w3c//dtd html 3.2 final//EN">
>SP will assume HTML4.dtd without issuing an error message.  (At least this
>is how my locally hacked SP behaves.  I don't think it's from anything I

Sorry, I think I'm wrong.  I've checked with a non-hacked SP 1.3 and it
does emit an error message.  Please ignore my babbling.

Liam Quinn