W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-validator-css@w3.org > September 2010

Re: Vendor-specific extensions: warnings, not errors

From: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 09:23:36 -0400 (EDT)
To: olivier Thereaux <olivier@thereaux.net>
cc: "Jens O. Meiert" <jens@meiert.com>, www-validator-css@w3.org
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.1009240916300.30511@wnl.j3.bet>
On Thu, 23 Sep 2010, olivier Thereaux wrote:

> Jens, I suspect that you're not being ignored, rather there's not much 
> of a CSS validator team at the moment. I see hardly any commit recently 
> on either http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/css-validator/ (or 
> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/css-val/ for that matter).

Exactly, I recently tried to find time to alter CSS3 background parsing 
based on the latest draft, but had to drop halfway... I hope to find more 
time soon.

> That said, I do think your idea has merit, and the lact of disagreement 
> from anyone on the list sounds like tacit agreement to me at this point. 
> I think the idea may have more chances of being adopted if you manage to 
> submit a patch, and find someone (probably on public-qa-dev?) to review 
> it.

Indeed, patches are welcomed. However in that case I would be happier to 
have the warning only for vendor extensions that are widely used (and even 
better the ones we can validate against their std equivalent).


-- 
Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras.

         ~~Yves
Received on Friday, 24 September 2010 13:23:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 27 June 2012 00:14:26 GMT