W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-validator-css@w3.org > September 2010

RE: Vendor-specific extensions: warnings, not errors

From: Douglas Perreault CPA* CITP <doug@perreault.us>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 23:00:27 -0400
To: "'Thomas Gambet'" <tgambet@w3.org>, "'Jens O. Meiert'" <jens@meiert.com>
Cc: <www-validator-css@w3.org>
Message-ID: <006101cb5b94$a4d08ed0$ee71ac70$@perreault.us>
Just a comment about this warning. For the grammar to be correct, it should
have the word "were" in place of the word "got." It should read: 

"vendor-specific  extensions were found and have only been checked for
syntactic correctness" 

Or alternatively:

"vendor-specific  extensions were found and were only checked for syntactic
correctness"

I also agree that this would be a great enhancement to the system.
Unfortunately I wouldn't know where to even begin to volunteer to get this
added in, so I'll leave it at that.

--Doug 

Douglas Perreault CPA* CITP
*CPA designation regulated by the State of Florida
Received on Friday, 24 September 2010 03:01:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 27 June 2012 00:14:26 GMT