On 4 Sep 2009, at 16:45, First Last wrote: > > filter:progid.dximagetransform.microsoft.insertfilterhere(properties > of said > Is this my mistake or yours? It said my options were to either > remove it, or > live with it being invalid? That's a bit arrogant, do you not think? > Since > yours is the only source claiming this as illegitimate syntax within > CSS files, but I could be wrong. Filter is a proprietary Microsoftism, and is not part of any CSS standard. I don't know what sources you are reading that claim it is part of any CSS standard, but they are wrong. -- David Dorward http://dorward.me.ukReceived on Monday, 7 September 2009 11:42:46 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 27 June 2012 00:14:25 GMT