- From: Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd) <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
- Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2009 12:31:34 +0100
- To: "Paul McKeown (Tiscali)" <ppjmckeown@tiscali.co.uk>
- CC: David Dorward <david@dorward.me.uk>, "www-validator-css@w3.org" <www-validator-css@w3.org>
Dear Paul -- I apologise if you felt there was any "sharp tone" in my message; on my part, there was no such intention, and my sole aim was to /help/ you to achieve your goal (which I regard as an eminently sensible one) rather than to hinder you in any way. Philip TAYLOR -------- Paul McKeown (Tiscali) wrote: > Philip, > > There was no agreement that the warning was in any way correct in CSS > 2.1; the behaviour of the validator simply defies the specification. > > My observations regarding behaviour of browsers was simply a response to > previous bleather by other correspondents - please review the thread. > > Personally all I care about is the correct behaviour of the validator - > and your sharp toned response to my request is unhelpful, in my view. > > It should be possible, in my opinion, to toggle off an informational > message, if any are generated. > > > Regards.
Received on Monday, 6 April 2009 11:32:19 UTC