Agreed, but I /think/ we agreed in the previous iteration of this discussion that it should be informational rather than a warning /qua/ warning, did we not ? Philip TAYLOR -------- David Dorward wrote: > Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd) wrote: >> The validator's sole purpose is to flag what is, and what is >> not, conformant, and specifically /not/ to flag >> what might cause problems in one or more browsers. > Warnings tend to cover issues of best practice and potential problems > rather than conformance issues (which should be errors). >Received on Monday, 6 April 2009 11:02:37 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 6 April 2009 11:02:39 GMT