W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-validator-css@w3.org > April 2009

Re: Floats need explicit width??

From: Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd) <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2009 12:01:49 +0100
Message-ID: <49D9E11D.80900@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
To: David Dorward <david@dorward.me.uk>
CC: "www-validator-css@w3.org" <www-validator-css@w3.org>
Agreed, but I /think/ we agreed in the previous
iteration of this discussion that it should be
informational rather than a warning /qua/ warning,
did we not ?

Philip TAYLOR
--------
David Dorward wrote:
> Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd) wrote:
>> The validator's sole purpose is to flag what is, and what is
>> not, conformant, and specifically /not/ to flag
>> what might cause problems in one or more browsers.
> Warnings tend to cover issues of best practice and potential problems 
> rather than conformance issues (which should be errors).
> 
Received on Monday, 6 April 2009 11:02:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 27 June 2012 00:14:23 GMT