W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-validator-css@w3.org > September 2005

RE: Comment/question about HTML validator response...

From: Burtin Hart <beh@atac.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 08:48:22 -0700
Message-ID: <001501c5bad6$14683af0$a755b240@atac.com>
To: "'olivier Thereaux'" <ot@w3.org>
Cc: "'CSS validator list'" <www-validator-css@w3.org>

Hello, Olivier.

On the Markup Validation Service and CSS Validation Service pages there are
notes with the identifier in bold text. Since the statement we are
discussing is "indeed a reminder," why not simply state it?

<b>Reminder:</b> "To work as intended . . ." See the W3C Markup Validation
Service for more information on validating your markup.

Burtin
-----Original Message-----
From: olivier Thereaux [mailto:ot@w3.org] 
Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2005 3:28 PM
To: Burtin Hart
Cc: CSS validator list
Subject: Re: Comment/question about HTML validator response...


Hello, Burtin,

On Sep 16, 2005, at 4:01, Burtin Hart wrote:
> My point is that it is not identified as "just" a note and therefore
> implies
> it is feedback from the CSS validator that your HTML *is* invalid.

As Bjoern noted in his first reply:
> This is indeed a reminder; could you make a proposal on how to revise
> the text?

The CSS validator is a free, open source tool that is relying a lot on 
its user community for development.
Feedback is very much welcome, and especially for cases where the 
wording could be improved, it is considered polite and constructive to 
not only point at the wrong wording, but also suggest a better 
replacement.

Can you think of any wording for that note that would make it clear it 
is "just" a note?

Thank you for your feedback.
olivier.
-- 
olivier Thereaux - W3C - http://www.w3.org/People/olivier/
W3C Open Source Software: http://www.w3.org/Status
Received on Friday, 16 September 2005 15:48:41 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 27 June 2012 00:14:16 GMT