Re: AW: URI Requirements

From: Craig A. Finseth (fin@finseth.com)
Date: Tue, Nov 17 1998

Next message: Henning Timcke: "AW: URI Requirements"
Previous message: Davis, Rob - MTVN: "RE: URI Requirements"
In reply to: Henning Timcke: "AW: URI Requirements"
Next in thread: Henning Timcke: "AW: URI Requirements"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Other mail archives: [this mailing list] [other W3C mailing lists]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1998 10:31:09 -0600 (CST)
Message-Id: <199811171631.KAA03630@isis.visi.com>
From: "Craig A. Finseth" <fin@finseth.com>
To: henning.timcke@werft22.com
Cc: gadams@spyglass.com, tenkate@natlab.research.philips.com, www-tv@w3.org
Subject: Re: AW: URI Requirements

   Craig, all
   I intended and intend the development of an outside protocol to handle scheduling and topological issues.

   What do you have in mind with:
   The approach that makes sense to me is to use an outside protocol (the
   EPG data) to resolve the date/time issues. 

   Supposed such an outside protocol existed, what URI requirements
   have not been listed here ?

I'll be reviewing the latest requirements draft as a whole in next few
minutes and will respond there.

   What is your comment on the DTV URL Scheme of Thomas Gomer ?

Gomer Thomas and I are working together.  (We spent a lot of last
Thursday collaborating.)

Craig

Next message: Henning Timcke: "AW: URI Requirements"
Previous message: Davis, Rob - MTVN: "RE: URI Requirements"
In reply to: Henning Timcke: "AW: URI Requirements"
Next in thread: Henning Timcke: "AW: URI Requirements"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Other mail archives: [this mailing list] [other W3C mailing lists]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]