Re: URI Requirements
From: Craig A. Finseth (fin@finseth.com)
Date: Mon, Nov 16 1998
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1998 13:01:10 -0600 (CST)
Message-Id: <199811161901.NAA19046@isis.visi.com>
From: "Craig A. Finseth" <fin@finseth.com>
To: gadams@spyglass.com
Cc: tenkate@natlab.research.philips.com, www-tv@w3.org
Subject: Re: URI Requirements
1. Under your recent URI requirements document, you have:
Given a URI, it must be possible for a receiver
to determine the time period(s) within which the resource can be
retrieved from the (also resolved) location.
Do you intend by this that the information to resolve such a
determination should be present in the URI directly? Or that in
combination with some unspecified higher-level-protocol, e.g., SAP, SDP,
etc., the URI may be used as a key to resolve such a determination?
If you mean the former, then this requirement goes beyond the
standard semantics of, say, HTTP URLs, which have no intrinsic temporal
validity outside of the scope of querying an origin server, etc., for
the resource and being informed it is no longer present, etc.
I would suggest that this requirement is an attempt to reconcile the
differences between the nature of TV broadcasting (programs on a
schedule) with the web.
The approach that makes sense to me is to use an outside protocol (the
EPG data) to resolve the date/time issues.
2. Regarding:
A URI should be resolvable under any of the following
network access conditions:
...
In HTTP's interpretation of URIs, other resource variation axes are
provided as well: language, content-encoding, etc. Do you envision these
applying in this context? What other variation axes do you anticipate?
Most transfer protocols provide some mechanism to carry the header
information. Thus, whatever versions (as named by headers) the
broadcaster desires can be sent.
Unlike the regular web, there is no negotiation phase: the broadcaster
makes the sole determination (based on indirect information such as
customer surveys) of what to send.
Bandwidth and cost factors will also come into play (:-).
Craig