RE: Getting started
From: Carr, Wayne (wayne.carr@intel.com)
Date: Fri, Oct 09 1998
Message-ID: <438BA6CBABC5D111AC4100A0C96B75B39A2897@FMSMSX41>
From: "Carr, Wayne" <wayne.carr@intel.com>
To: "'Philipp Hoschka'" <ph@w3.org>, www-tv@w3.org
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 1998 15:16:55 -0700
Subject: RE: Getting started
I think the appropriate thing is to review/coordinate with other W3C groups
(especially the HTML group) and I would like to participate in that process.
While I think it would be appropriate to review any ATSC approved spec that
comes out of DASE, I don't think that should mean any endorsement of any of
the current conflicting proposals in DASE - and BHTML is just one of those
proposals. It's one that I believe conflicts with and duplicates work
already being done in the W3C in other groups. I don't think our group
should grant the BHTML proposal any special status.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Philipp Hoschka [mailto:ph@w3.org]
> Sent: Friday, October 09, 1998 1:12 PM
> To: www-tv@w3.org
> Subject: Getting started
>
>
>
> In the immediate future, we need to address the following
> discussion items from
>
> http://www.w3.org/TV/TVWeb
>
> 1) Document on TV-specific requirements on CSS
> 2) Document on "tv" URL-scheme
>
> The page already lists a number of people that have
> expressed interest to do the work required here.
> It also lists the current status that I'm aware of, e.g.
> which documents already exist.
>
> To get started, I guess the best way to procede is
> for one or more of the people listed as "workers" for
> each topic to come up with strawman proposal(s) on these
> topics, and send them to this list. To distinguish between
> the two topics, please put "URL:" or "CSS:" at the beginning
> of the subject line.
>
> The page also lists a discussion item on a "Document on
> TV-specific requirements on HTML". My feeling is that
> this has been a bit overtaken by events since the IG proposal
> was written, since different groups have already started to work on
> this (see page for details)
>
> If there are no objections, I would thus like to change
> this work item into reviewing eventual working
> drafts coming out of these groups on whether they meet the
> TV-specific requirements they claim to address,
> rather than writing our own requirements document.
> However, I'm open to suggestions.
>
> -Philipp Hoschka, W3C
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Philipp Hoschka |
> http://www.w3.org/people/hoschka |
> | World Wide Web Consortium
> | MIT-LCS
> ph@w3.org | 545, Technology Square
> Tel:(+1) 617.258.0604 | Cambridge, MA 02139
> Fax:(+1) 617.258.5999 | USA
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>