W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-talk@w3.org > March to April 2004

Re: complexity (was: Re: XHTML and RDF)

From: Orion Adrian <oadrian@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 10:33:45 -0400
To: www-talk@w3.org
Message-ID: <BAY1-F107gMtgPybO1z0004145e@hotmail.com>


>[moved to www-talk from www-qa]
>
>On Wed, 14 Apr 2004, Alex Rousskov wrote:
> >
> > However, the correct answer in this situation is not rubberstamping. The
> > correct answer, in this context, would be to let X publish its standard
> > outside of the W3C venue. W3C should not be involved if there is only
> > one company behind the technology.
>
>The implication was that X and Z agree on most of the other aspects of the
>spec, and are both going to be implementing it. I should have been
>clearer. (And this is definitely not hypothetical -- I've been involved in
>situations much like this in a W3C context many times.)

Can you give an example of how doing it X's way is going to be Z out of 
business? You mentioned this, but I fail to see how a construct in a 
language is going to harm to Z?

Orion Adrian

_________________________________________________________________
Free up your inbox with MSN Hotmail Extra Storage! Multiple plans available. 
http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-us&page=hotmail/es2&ST=1/go/onm00200362ave/direct/01/
Received on Thursday, 15 April 2004 10:34:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 27 October 2010 18:14:28 GMT