- From: Aaron Swartz <me@aaronsw.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 11:07:32 -0500
- To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org, www-talk@w3.org
- Cc: Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>, "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
I'm fed up. The W3C has been taken over by corporations with only selfish interests at heart. The Web services people swallow resources for an goal antithetical to Web Architecture. The XML people shoehorn data into a format meant for documents and reinvent several wheels doing so. The RDF people are afraid to do anything worthwhile with the power of their technology and instead worry for no good reason about backwards-compatibility. And the W3T sits quietly, afraid to do anything to remedy the situation. I'm not going to take it anymore. W3C-style standards bodies clearly aren't working anymore. Perhaps they made sense in the old days of the browser wars, but we're no longer getting innovation from Working Groups who have so many members that they have to form subgroups to decide what they're going to do about deciding what they're going to do. I humbly suggest a solution, based on comments from TimBL, SimonStl and many others: * Desiging the specs are a small independent core team of people who really know their stuff and are concerned about simplicity and the Right Thing. * Assisting them is an open group who contributes to the spec-writing and application-testing, letting the core team focus on the design. * Overseeing things and making "arbitrary" decisions is a widely-respected member of the community. This is, perhaps, the way W3C originally worked, but most of the time it doesn't work like this anymore. I've left out the details of the process to keep this message short. If there is interest I will make them clearer. Things I'd like to see developed in this model: * RDF-Model (a clean version of N-Triples) * RDF-Logic (a FOL system with URIs) * RDF-Query (a standardized API and syntax for managing RDF) * RDF-Sites (an outline for how RDF fits with HTTP). Each of these should be relatively simple specifications, and easy to make if this plan works out how as I imagine. While such groups may use W3C (or any other group's) resources, like web-space and telecon-bridges, it must be clear that they are not bound by W3C process and are not responsible to the membership. I am willing to invest a my time into making this happen and am interested in collaborators. Please your feedback to me or <www- talk@w3.org> and thanks for your time. -- Aaron Swartz [http://www.aaronsw.com/]
Received on Wednesday, 22 May 2002 12:07:36 UTC