Questions about HTTP 1.1's new status code of 100 (Continue). 1. How does this status code make HTTP more efficient? The spec states that the client will know that its request (so far) hasn't been rejected and it is okay to continue the request. I'm not sure how this status code is more efficient than the client finishing up its request and receiving an error code. Can someone think of an example that explains this more? I'm thinking that 1 or 2 packets are saved by doing this. Or are there greater savings? (Does anyone have research findings they would like to share?) 2. It appears that multiple response codes are possible... I'm not sure if I am interpreting this correctly... is it like this? Client: GET / HTTP/1.1 [headers go here] CRLF entity-body Server: HTTP/1.1 100 Continue [midway between the client's request] HTTP/1.1 200 OK [when the client is finished requesting] [headers go here] CRLF entity-body Is this the correct interpretation? Regards, Clinton WongReceived on Tuesday, 8 October 1996 19:19:14 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 27 October 2010 18:14:19 GMT