> Okay, cool. So that makes what, three of us now who like > ","? If we actually are in reasonable agreement on this, > we should probably make this suggestion to the URI wg as > soon as possible. > > Any more opinions? Speak now or forever hold your peace... Sorry, Ping, I have to come in on the "." side. No extra character to deal with, still unambiguous, and a certain aesthetic symmetry. And "," is a shell-interpreted character in MSDOS (sorry, I know I shouldn't mention that evil word here). "msie http://0:4f53:b6a9:193d.80/" will run just fine on Win95. "msie http://0:4f53:b6a9:193d,80/" will choke.Received on Friday, 16 August 1996 15:08:50 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:38:40 GMT