W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-talk@w3.org > November to December 1995

Re: Content negotiation

From: Arnt Gulbrandsen <agulbra@troll.no>
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 1995 14:32:12 +0100
Message-Id: <199511091332.OAA11128@pentagram.troll.no>
To: Brian Behlendorf <brian@organic.com>
Cc: Shel Kaphan <sjk@amazon.com>, www-talk@w3.org
On Wed  8 Nov 1995 15:09:46 -0800,
   Brian Behlendorf <brian@organic.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Nov 1995, Shel Kaphan wrote:
> > And by the way, I wasn't talking about course-grained, dynamic
> > content-negotiation per se, but about the fine grained and constant
> > properties of browsers such as "can-center-text",
> > "tables-can-contain-forms", etc.
> Crucial design goal decision time, folks:
> Do we want to support, through mechanisms in HTTP, the ability to express 
> a bitmap of capabilities within specific content types (like HTML), or 
> not?

In HTTP?  For a browser to say, in its request, "the answer to this
request will not tickle a bug in my support of forms inside tables"
seems patently ridiculous.

If a server wants that detailed browser information, it _must_ obtain
the information from some source which can be updated as new bugs in a
browser is discovered.  (By browser I mean not only name but version
and even compilation time.)

Received on Thursday, 9 November 1995 10:17:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:32:58 UTC