W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-talk@w3.org > November to December 1995

Re: Content negotiation

From: Brian Behlendorf <brian@organic.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 1995 15:09:46 -0800 (PST)
To: Shel Kaphan <sjk@amazon.com>
Cc: www-talk@w3.org
Message-Id: <Pine.SGI.3.91.951108142712.17261P-100000@fully.organic.com>
On Wed, 8 Nov 1995, Shel Kaphan wrote:
> And by the way, I wasn't talking about course-grained, dynamic
> content-negotiation per se, but about the fine grained and constant
> properties of browsers such as "can-center-text",
> "tables-can-contain-forms", etc.

Crucial design goal decision time, folks:

Do we want to support, through mechanisms in HTTP, the ability to express 
a bitmap of capabilities within specific content types (like HTML), or 
not? 

Supporting exact capabilities seems to make sense given the current modus 
operandi of adding new functionality to the web by incremental advances - 
a new feature is desired, a new HTML tag or attribute is defined.  If 
this is truely the evolutionary path developers want to see HTML and the 
web in general take, then there's not much choice - we have to do it, 
elegance be damned.  

Or, we could decide that HTTP negotiation + simple, solid, 
easily-implementable-to-conformance-levels MIME types provide a better 
evolutionary path, and avoid the cache-busting swamp of capability 
bitmaps.

Let's make a decision on this issue, or we'll be passing the buck until 
the whole deal is irrelevant.

   Awaiting the day when browsers aren't responsible for rendering, Brian

--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--
brian@organic.com  brian@hyperreal.com  http://www.[hyperreal,organic].com/
Received on Wednesday, 8 November 1995 18:44:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 27 October 2010 18:14:18 GMT