On Fri, 14 Jul 1995, Fisher Mark wrote: > Netscape has announced support for Java in their browsers, probably by the > end of the year > (<URL:http://www.netscape.com/newsref/pr/newsrelease25.html>). This lets > the genie out of the bottle, as Netscape can then be extended in a nearly > arbitrary fashion. From what I understand of Java, it should not take a lot > of time to create a file upload applet. Java is cool, and I'd definitely prefer to see it used to extend *capabilities* of browsers (new widgets, a better data type handler, a new or better protocol handler) than the majority of uses I see now (animation), but does the presence of Java in a browser suddenly mean the browser doesn't have to have any standard or well-classed behaviors? Should we just ditch forms altogether because a Java AWT widget could be used instead? At what point do the worlds of Java and formalism collide? Dan? That said, Java is a damn good way to *prototype* new potential web standards. Brian --=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-- brian@organic.com brian@hyperreal.com http://www.[hyperreal,organic].com/Received on Friday, 14 July 1995 17:08:16 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 27 October 2010 18:14:17 GMT