W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > January 2014

Re: Fall back strategy for manifest

From: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 14:14:02 +0100
Message-ID: <52E7AD1A.8020401@w3.org>
To: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
CC: Edward O'Connor <eoconnor@apple.com>, "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
On 28/01/2014 12:13 , Marcos Caceres wrote:
> So, I agree that the HTML should come first - and this works nicely
> for things like the application-name. What I'm still not 100% on is
> what I should do with things like icons... if one set of icons is
> declared in the HTML, should I bother looking for the icons in the
> manifest at all (i.e., should I union them)?

I think it makes sense to union them. Say you have data in your manifest 
describing a dozen different icons for different contexts. It would be 
really strange if by just overriding one in HTML you suddenly lost all 
the others.

-- 
Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
Received on Tuesday, 28 January 2014 13:14:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:33:24 UTC