On Jan 21, 2013 2:14 PM, "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@annevk.nl> wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 7:24 PM, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com> wrote: > > Please correct me if my characterization is wrong, but it appears to me that > > this entire affair is about content-type (mime type) squatting i.e., trying > > to squeeze (X)HTML into content-type: text/html. If this is true, why on > > earth would such an endeavor be encouraged by the W3C or its TAG? > > Maybe because XML is listed quite prominently under "What is Web > architecture?" in http://www.w3.org/2004/10/27-tag-charter.html though > I would consider that particular part of the charter misguided. (It's > also not at all practiced these days.) Fixing *that* might be something for the TAG to encourage. > -- > http://annevankesteren.nl/ >
Received on Monday, 28 January 2013 16:04:36 UTC