W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > October 2012

RE: TAG F2F agenda more or less complete

From: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2012 00:34:08 -0700
To: Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com>, "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
CC: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Stuart Williams <skw@epimorphics.com>, Dan Appelquist <dan@bluevia.com>, Amy van der Hiel <amy@w3.org>
Message-ID: <C68CB012D9182D408CED7B884F441D4D1E367FB071@nambxv01a.corp.adobe.com>
On the topic of "URI scheme proliferation", I think the reference
 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2012Sep/0012.html

is incorrect (since it is about media type suffixes, not URI scheme suffixes).

One pointer (although both broader and narrower) might be:

          https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=18975




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Noah Mendelsohn [mailto:nrm@arcanedomain.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2012 5:35 PM
> To: www-tag@w3.org
> Cc: Mark Nottingham; Stuart Williams; Dan Appelquist; Amy van der Hiel
> Subject: TAG F2F agenda more or less complete
>
> I have taken a first cut at assigning time slots for our sessions, and as
> previously noted, acting on requests to update the required reading. See
> [1,2]. Astute readers will note a few items in the body of the agenda that
> don't have assigned times, and a few TBD slots. I think this is close
> enough for now, or at least for comment by the TAG.
>
> I am teaching during the day tomorrow, then traveling overnight, so it's
> unlikely there will be significant further updates until Friday evening the
> earliest.
>
> Thank you!
>
> Noah
>
> P.S. Jonathan: I >think< I assigned sessions requiring your presence for
> afternoon slots when you can be available, but I couldn't quickly find the
> e-mail with your exact conflicts. Please check that I didn't miss anything.
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/tag-weekly

> [2] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2012/10/07-agenda.html

>
>
> =====================================================
>
>     !DOCTYPE html>
>
>     [1]W3C | [2]TAG | [3]previous | [4]this | [5]next
>
>        [1] http://www.w3.org/

>        [2] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/

>        [3] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2012/09/27-agenda

>        [4] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2012/10/07-agenda

>        [5] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2012/10/07-agenda

>
>               W3C TAG meeting 7-9 October 2012 in London, UK
>
>     Nearby: [6]work plan - [7]issues list - [8]findings -
>     [9]www-tag archive - [10]tag archive - Actions: ([11]open,
>     [12]pending review) [13]logistics
>
>        [6] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/products/

>        [7] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues

>        [8] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/findings

>        [9] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/

>       [10] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/

>       [11] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/open

>       [12] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/pendingreview

>       [13] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2012/10/local-arrangements.html

>
>     Online table of: [14]scribing assignments
>
>       [14] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2012/10/F2FScribing.html

>
> Agenda Summary
>
>     Sunday, 7 October 2012
>     Agenda
>     09:00-09:15
>       * [15]Convene, review agenda
>       * [16]Review TAG Priorities for 2012
>
>     09:15-10:30
>       * [17]HTTP 2.0 (w/Mark Nottingham)
>
>     10:30-10:45 Break
>     10:45-11:45
>       * [18]URI Scheme Proliferation (w/Mark Nottingham)
>
>     11:45-13:00 Lunch
>     13:00-14:30
>       * [19]Fragment ID Semantics (Last Call Draft & RFC 3023bis)
>
>     14:30-15:00 Break
>     15:00-15:30
>       * [20]Architecture of the World Wide Semantic Web
>
>     15:30-16:00
>       * [21]TAG Election Procedures
>
>     16:00-16:45
>       * [22]Administration
>
>     Monday, 8 October 2012
>     Agenda
>     09:00-10:30
>       * [23]Publishing and linking on the Web
>
>     10:30-10:50 Break
>     10:50-12:00
>       * [24]Governance Framework
>
>     12:00-13:15 Lunch
>     13:15-14:15
>       * [25]TAG effectiveness
>
>     14:15-14:45
>       * [26]Issue list for Jeff Jaffe
>
>     14:45-15:15 Break
>     15:15-16:45
>       * [27]Documenting meaning of individual IRIs (ISSUE-57)
>
>     Tuesday, 9 October 2012
>     Agenda
>     09:00-10:15
>       * [28]Offline applications
>
>     10:15-10:30 Break
>     10:30-12:00 TBD
>     12:00-13:15 Lunch
>     13:15-14:15
>       * [29]Review TAG Priorities for 2012
>       * Reassign Robin Berjon's actions
>
>     14:15-14:45 Privacy (needs an agenda item)
>     14:45-15:15 Break
>     15:15-16:00 TBD
>     16:00 ADJOURN
>
> Logistics
>
>     Venue
>            BCS, The Chartered Institute for IT
>            First Floor, The Davidson Building
>            5 Southampton Street London WC2E 7HA
>            Tel: +44 (0) 1793 417 666 | Fax: +44 (0) 1793 417 669
>
>     We are scheduled to meet in the Wilkes Room all three days.
>
>     See [30]logistics for further details.
>
>       [30] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2012/10/local-arrangements.html

>
> Required Reading
>
>       * [31]Best Practices for Fragment Identifiers and Media Type
>         Definitions W3C Editor's Draft 23 September 2012
>       * [32]Updated Product Page on Fragment Identifier Work
>       * [33]RFC 3023bis regarding fragment ID semantics for +xml
>         media types
>       * First Public Working Draft [34]Publishing and Linking on
>         the Web: W3C Working Draft 18 September 2012
>       * [35]Governance and Web Architecture W3C Editor's Draft 22
>         September 201 ([36]Larry's blog entry on governance is also
>         suggested)
>       * [37]ISSUE-57 background statement from JAR and HT (28
>         September 2012) ([38]snapshot)
>       * [39]URI Usage Primer How to Use URIs in Data: W3C Editor's
>         Draft 03 October 2012
>       * [40]ISSUE-57 "Proposal 27" from JAR and HT (30 September
>         2012) (see [41]email)
>       * [42]31 March 2012 telcon discussion of Offline Web
>         Applications
>       * [43]Web Architecture Objectives Matrix
>       * [44]Offline Applications (e-mail from Ashok Malhotra)
>
>       [31] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/mimeTypesAndFragids-2012-09-

> 23.html
>       [32] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/products/fragids-2012-09-26.html

>       [33]
> http://www.w3.org/2006/02/son-of-3023/draft-murata-kohn-lilley-xml-04.html

>       [34] http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-publishing-linking-20120918/

>       [35] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/governanceFramework.html

>       [36]
> http://blogs.adobe.com/standards/2012/09/19/governance-and-standards/

>       [37] http://www.w3.org/wiki/TagIssue57Proposal27/Background

>       [38]
> http://www.w3.org/wiki/index.php?title=TagIssue57Proposal27/Background&o

> ldid=61033
>       [39] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/uri-usage-primer-2012-10-03/

>       [40]
> http://www.w3.org/wiki/index.php?title=TagIssue57Proposal27&oldid=61086

>       [41] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2012Oct/0003.html

>       [42] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2011/03/31-minutes.html#item04

>       [43] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/objectives-matrix-20120930

>       [44] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2012Sep/0009.html

>
> Agenda Details
>
>      1. Convene, review agenda
>            + Scribes: TAG members are encouraged to sign up for
>              scribing by using CVS to edit [45]scribing assignments
>              table, or by emailing the chair
>            + Roll call
>                 o Regrets: Robin Berjon, Jonathan Rees
>                 o Jonathan can attend by phone starting around 1:00
>                   London time (8:00 US Eastern).
>            + Approve minutes of teleconferences:
>                 o [46]20 September 2012
>                 o [47]27 September 2012
>            + F2F Main Goals:
>                 o Go to last call on Fragment Identifiers
>                   Recommendation
>                 o Review comments on Publishing and Linking FPWD
>                 o Set direction for documenting URI meaning (&
>                   httpRange-14)
>                 o Meet w/Mark Nottingham to discuss HTTP 2.0 & URI
>                   scheme proliferation
>      2. Review TAG Priorities for 2012 - 2013
>            + Goals:
>                 o Remind ourselves of priorities and commitments
>                   from [48]TAG product pages
>                 o The Sunday session is primarily a quick level-set
>                   at the start of the F2F — updates and debates
>                   about the priorities will happen as we go along
>                   and in a session on Tuesdeay.
>      3. Administration:
>            + Future TAG F2F meetings
>                 o Choose location/dates for winter meeting
>                 o Start thinking about location/dates for spring
>                   meeting
>                 o TPAC (next item)
>            + TPAC Planning
>                 o Note AB interest in meeting with TAG
>                 o Larry Masinter suggests we think about Publishing
>                   and Linking for TPAC
>                 o NOTE: Larry, Peter and Ashok will attend TPAC,
>                   Henry is hoping to. Noah has a conflict and so
>                   will not.
>            + Group photo
>            + Upcoming TAG election and open seat: four TAG seats
>              will be filled in the upcoming election. Should the
>              TAG do anything to facilitate a successful election
>              (noting the unusually large number of open positions,
>              and thus the likely large impact on the TAG.)
>      4. HTTP 2.0:
>            + [49]IETF HTTP Bis Working Group chair [50]Mark
>              Nottingham will join us for this session
>            + Goal:
>                 o Get update from Mark Nottingham on HTTP 2.0
>                 o Decide whether TAG action is needed on HTTP
>                   futures
>            + Background:
>                 o [51]January 2012 F2F discussion with Mark
>                   Nottingham
>                 o [52]ACTION-682: on - Jonathan Rees - When HTTPbis
>                   group says time is right, suggest to TAG sections
>                   of HTTPbis specification that TAG should review -
>                   Due: 2012-10-06 - OPEN
>                 o [53]ACTION-733: on - Larry Masinter - prepare for
>                   30 minute report on HTTP 2.0/SPDY at October 2012
>                   F2F - Due: 2012-09-28 - OPEN
>                 o Earlier background:
>                      # Thread starting with e-mail from Yves Lafon:
>                        [54]Discussion points on HTTP "evolutions"
>                        [ACTION-618] — also related thread starting
>                        with [55]response from Larry Masinter
>                      # [56]ACTION-618: on - Yves Lafon - With help
>                        from Larry, Noah, and Jeni to prepare
>                        analysis on development around HTTP, like
>                        spdy, ssl use, websocket... - Due:
>                        2011-12-06 - CLOSED
>                      # [57]ACTION-626: on - Noah Mendelsohn -
>                        Schedule discussion of how, if at all, TAG
>                        should continue to be involved with SPDY -
>                        Due: 2011-11-15 - CLOSED
>                      # [58]TPAC 2011 Discussion of SPDY
>                      # [59]Jeni Tennison's email on SPDY and
>                        related thread ([60]here and [61]here too)
>                      # June 2011 F2F [62]session with Jim Gettys on
>                        [63]buffer bloat
>      5. URI scheme proliferation:
>            + Mark Nottingham will join us for this session
>            + Goal:
>                 o Consider need for TAG focus on URI scheme
>                   proliferation
>            + Background:
>                 o E-mail from Henry Thompson [64]FYI: Suffixed
>                   media type registrations about to go forward
>                 o [65]ACTION-724: on - Henry Thompson - investigate
>                   possible TAG efforts on URI scheme proliferation
>                   and extension points - Due: 2012-10-05 - OPEN
>      6. Fragment identifier semantics:
>            + Product page: [66]TAG Product: Fragment Identifiers
>              and Mime Types
>            + TAG members assigned (as listed in product page): Jeni
>              Tennison, Larry Masinter (offered to help on 3 May
>              2012), Henry Thompson, Yves Lafon (replacing Jonathan
>              Rees as agreed at June 2011 F2F), Peter Linss (offered
>              to help on 4 August 2011)
>            + Goals:
>                 o Agree to publish last call working draft of
>                   [67]Best Practices for Fragment Identifiers and
>                   Media Type Definitions
>                 o Agree input to [68]RFC 3023bis regarding fragment
>                   ID semantics for +xml media types (We may do this
>                   as a separate session if necessary)
>            + Background:
>                 o TAG Recommendation on Fragment IDS:
>                      # [69]Best Practices for Fragment Identifiers
>                        and Media Type Definitions W3C Editor's
>                        Draft 23 September 2012 (required reading)
>                      # [70]Updated Product Page (required reading)
>                 o RFC 3023bis and Fragment ID Semantics
>                      # [71]ACTION-689: on - Henry Thompson - work
>                        with Noah to draft a further request to the
>                        3023bis editor from the TAG to include
>                        advice regarding what a particular +xml
>                        media type registration should do wrt fragid
>                        semantics along the lines in the discussion
>                        on media types and fragment identifiers at
>                        the f2f on 2012-04-04 - Due: 2012-10-01 -
>                        OPEN
>                      # [72]RFC 3023bis regarding fragment ID
>                        semantics for +xml media types (required
>                        reading)
>      7. Issue list for Jeff Jaffe:
>            + Goal:
>                 o Start building list of issues to highlight for
>                   Jeff Jaffe
>            + Background:
>                 o [73]ACTION-563: on - Noah Mendelsohn - Arrange
>                   for periodic TAG key issues reports to Jeff per
>                   June 2011 F2F - Due: 2012-11-01 - OPEN
>      8. Publishing and linking on the Web:
>            + TAG members assigned: Larry Masinter, Ashok Malhotra
>            + Goals:
>                 o Review comments on First Public Working Draft
>                   [74]Publishing and Linking on the Web: W3C
>                   Working Draft 18 September 2012
>                 o Update [75]product page to reflect current plans,
>                   goals and success criteria
>            + See also agenda item on [76]governance
>            + Background:
>                 o First Public Working Draft [77]Publishing and
>                   Linking on the Web: W3C Working Draft 18
>                   September 2012 (required reading)
>                 o [78]ACTION-732: on - Larry Masinter - prepare
>                   FPWD on Publishing and Linking - Due: 2012-09-05
>                   - CLOSED
>                 o [79]ACTION-737: on - Yves Lafon - On Tuesday 4
>                   Sept, if no objections, publish FPWD on
>                   Publishing and Linking - Due: 2012-09-06 - CLOSED
>                 o [80]ACTION-667: on - Noah Mendelsohn - Check,
>                   when publishing and linking wraps, whether it's
>                   time to reinvest in
>                   http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2011/12/evolution/Regi

>                   stries.html - Due: 2012-07-15 - OPEN
>      9. Architecture of the World Wide Semantic Web (AWWSW):
>            + Jonathan Rees requests 30 mins: review final report
>              drafts and either accept them, or request additional
>              work (of Jonathan; the task group has disbanded).
>            + [81]ACTION-201: on - Jonathan Rees - Report on status
>              of AWWSW discussions - Due: 2012-10-02 - OPEN
>     10. Governance Framework:
>            + Larry Masinter requests brief consideration of
>              [82]Governance and Web Architecture W3C Editor's Draft
>              22 September 201 (required reading)
>            + See also [83]Larry's blog entry on governance
>     11. Documenting meaning of individual IRIs (ISSUE-57):
>            + Product page: [84]TAG Product: URI Documentation
>              Discovery
>            + TAG members assigned: Henry Thompson with help from
>              Jonathan Rees & Jeni Tennison
>            + Goals:
>                 o Decide how to discharge our obligation to the
>                   community regarding what we did with the
>                   proposals that they provided us back in the
>                   spring
>                 o Review new [85]background statement from JAR and
>                   HT (28 September 2012) ([86]snapshot)
>                 o Review: [87]URI Usage Primer How to Use URIs in
>                   Data: W3C Editor's Draft 03 October 2012
>                 o Review "Proposal 27"
>            + Background:
>                 o [88]ACTION-704: on - Jonathan Rees - with help
>                   from Jeni and Henry to try to identify next steps
>                   for moving forward on httpRange-14 - Due:
>                   2012-09-17 - OPEN
>                 o [89]Background statement from JAR and HT (28
>                   September 2012) ([90]snapshot) (required reading)
>                 o [91]URI Usage Primer How to Use URIs in Data: W3C
>                   Editor's Draft 03 October 2012
>                 o [92]"Proposal 27" from JAR and HT (30 September
>                   2012) (see [93]e-mail) (required reading)
>                 o Though not formally agreed by the TAG as
>                   background reading David Booth [94]suggests the
>                   following additional documents:
>                      # [95]"Framing the URI Resource Identity
>                        Problem: The Fundamental Use Case of the
>                        Semantic Web"
>                      # [96]Resource Identity and Semantic
>                        Extensions: Making Sense of Ambiguity
>     12. Offline applications:
>            + TAG member assigned: Ashok Malhotra
>            + Should we include web app / offline storage here?
>            + Goal:
>                 o Decide whether to launch initiative on offline
>                   Web applications
>                 o If so, prepare product page with goals, success
>                   criteria and dates.
>                 o Determine objectives of any architectural work in
>                   this area using the [97]Wed Architecture
>                   objectives matrix as reference
>                 o Clarify relationship to [98]ACTION-717: on -
>                   Ashok Malhotra - Propose outline for possible TAG
>                   document (finding or rec) on architectural issues
>                   relating to storage sync, linked data, etc. Due
>                   2012-07-15 - Due: 2012-10-10 - OPEN
>            + Background:
>                 o [99]Offline Applications (e-mail from Ashok
>                   Malhotra) (required reading)
>                 o [100]ACTION-529: on - Noah Mendelsohn - Schedule
>                   telcon discussion of a potential TAG product
>                   relating to offline applications and packaged Web
>                   - Due: 2011-02-17 - CLOSED
>                 o [101]31 March 2012 telcon discussion of Offline
>                   Web Applications (required reading)
>                 o [102]ACTION-717: on - Ashok Malhotra - Propose
>                   outline for possible TAG document (finding or
>                   rec) on architectural issues relating to storage
>                   sync, linked data, etc. Due 2012-07-15 - Due:
>                   2012-10-10 - OPEN
>                 o [103]Objectives matrix (required reading)
>     13. Privacy (need to draft agenda item -- note Robin Berjon was
>         responsible for work in this area
>     14. TAG effectiveness:
>            + TAG member assigned: Noah Mendelsohn
>            + Goals
>                 o Consider followup to [104]June Discussion of TAG
>                   Effectiveness ([105]part 1 and [106]part 2)
>                 o Review [107]Wed Architecture Objectives Matrix
>            + Background:
>                 o [108]Objectives matrix (required reading)
>                 o [109]ACTION-726: on - Jonathan Rees - Make a list
>                   of questions to which webarch and the findings
>                   suggest answers, as input to possible 'study
>                   design' and/or communication to chairs etc. -
>                   Due: 2012-09-17 - CLOSED
>                 o Larry Masinter has suggested using the matrix for
>                   "outward facing purposes"
>                 o [110]ACTION-725 on JT - progress ?
>                 o Maybe: 10 minutes to talk about TAG issues list
>                   (this was JAR's discussion-closing suggestion at
>                   an earlier F2F, see [111]ACTION-692: on - Noah
>                   Mendelsohn - consider JAR's april request to
>                   discuss, for 10 mins, issues list at oct f2f -
>                   Due: 2012-09-10 - OPEN, perhaps mooted by
>                   objectives matrix)
>                 o [112]ACTION-709: on - Noah Mendelsohn - Talk to
>                   Jeff & W3M about TAG futures - Due: 2012-06-06 -
>                   CLOSED
>     15. TAG Election Procedures
>            + Goals:
>                 o Understand concerns that have been raised about
>                   TAG election procedures (followup to
>                   [113]discussion on 26 April 2012 teleconference)
>                 o Decide what role, if any, it's appropriate for
>                   the TAG to play in addressing such concerns
>                 o If based on the above considerations it's
>                   appropriate for the TAG to get involved,
>                   investigate the merits of the concerns raised,
>                   and decide on next steps
>            + Background:
>                 o Robin Berjon has made [114]proposals for
>                   "reforming" the TAG election process
>                 o [115]Discussion on 26 April 2012 teleconference
>                 o [116]ACTION-701: on - Noah Mendelsohn - Follow up
>                   with Robin on election reform - Due: 2012-08-01 -
>                   OPEN
>                 o [117]ACTION-702: on - Noah Mendelsohn - Follow up
>                   with Robin on election reform proposals - Due:
>                   2012-05-03 - CLOSED
>                 o The chair (Noah) has [118]commented "...changes
>                   to the W3C process are formally the
>                   responsibility of the AB, W3C management and the
>                   AC. Normally, we don't discuss process issues on
>                   the TAG, except when they affect our ability to
>                   do our technical work [...] Obviously, changing
>                   the processes relating to the TAG itself is a
>                   special case, and I'm fine with scheduling some
>                   informal brainstorming". Larry [119]raises a
>                   similar concern. The chair then [120]wrote: "we
>                   will have a brief discussion of this on Thursday,
>                   and we will do it with the understanding that any
>                   formal work on changing the process is
>                   coordinated by the AB/Team/AC."
>                 o See also extensive e-mail thread(s) with subject
>                   [121]TAG productivity, elections, and
>                   httpRange-14 (but note that for discussion on 25
>                   April, the chair intends to limit the scope to
>                   election reform, and not to broader questions of
>                   TAG findings, TAG effectiveness, etc.)
>     16. Action item review:
>            + [122]Pending review actions in [123]Tracker
>            + [124]Overdue actions in [125]Tracker
>            + [126]Open actions in [127]Tracker
>     17. Open issue review:
>            + This is an optional agenda item: we'll do it if
>              there's time
>            + Goal: review our list of [128]open issues — look
>              especially for issues that are open but dormant decide
>              to assign resource/close/leave as background activity.
>     18. Outplan:
>            + The following are potentially worth discussing, but
>              are not formally scheduled on the agenda:
>                 o [129]ACTION-669: on - Henry Thompson - Review
>                   http://www.w3.org/TR/qaframe-spec/#ref-define-pra

>                   ctice and see whether TAG needs to do more on
>                   references to evolving specs Due: 2012-08-01 -
>                   Due: 2013-01-01 - OPEN
>                 o polyglot (HT)
>                 o HTML extension registry ([130]ACTION-672 on JT)
>                 o privacy (NM?)
>                 o scalability (PL)
>                 o vendor prefixes (PL)
>                 o ISSUE-50 if progress has been made (JAR, HT)
>                      # [131]ACTION-478: on - Jonathan Rees -
>                        Prepare a second draft of a finding on
>                        persistence of references, to be based on
>                        decision tree from Oct. 2010 F2F - Due:
>                        2012-10-06 - OPEN
>                      # [132]ACTION-666: on - Henry Thompson -
>                        Update
>                        http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/products/persiste

>                        nce-2012-01-23.html to reflect agreement on
>                        26 January telcon regarding settling at F2F
>                        - Due: 2012-09-01 - CLOSED (JAR commented:
>                        Have been making progress in background on
>                        what to do with this, based on input from HT
>                        and LM, but not sure I'll have anything to
>                        discuss.)
>       __________________________________________________________
>
>       [45] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2012/10/F2FScribing.html

>       [46] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2012/09/20-minutes

>       [47] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2012/09/27-minutes

>       [48] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/products/

>       [49] https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/charter/

>       [50] http://www.mnot.net/

>       [51] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2012/01/06-minutes#item02

>       [52] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/682

>       [53] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/733

>       [54] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2011Dec/0034.html

>       [55] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2011Dec/0042.html

>       [56] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/618

>       [57] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/626

>       [58] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2011/11/04-minutes.html#item01

>       [59] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2011Sep/0033.html

>       [60] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2011Sep/0035.html

>       [61] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2011Sep/0050.html

>       [62] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2011/06/06-minutes.html#item0x

>       [63] http://mirrors.bufferbloat.net/Talks/PragueIETF/

>       [64] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2012Sep/0012.html

>       [65] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/724

>       [66] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/products/fragids.html

>       [67] http://www.w3.org/TR/fragid-best-practices/

>       [68]
> http://www.w3.org/2006/02/son-of-3023/draft-murata-kohn-lilley-xml-04.html

>       [69] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/mimeTypesAndFragids-2012-09-

> 23.html
>       [70] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/products/fragids-2012-09-26.html

>       [71] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/689

>       [72]
> http://www.w3.org/2006/02/son-of-3023/draft-murata-kohn-lilley-xml-04.html

>       [73] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/563

>       [74] http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-publishing-linking-20120918/

>       [75] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/products/PublishingLinking.html

>       [77] http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-publishing-linking-20120918/

>       [78] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/732

>       [79] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/737

>       [80] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/667

>       [81] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/201

>       [82] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/governanceFramework.html

>       [83]
> http://blogs.adobe.com/standards/2012/09/19/governance-and-standards/

>       [84] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/products/defininguris.html

>       [85] http://www.w3.org/wiki/TagIssue57Proposal27/Background

>       [86]
> http://www.w3.org/wiki/index.php?title=TagIssue57Proposal27/Background&o

> ldid=61033
>       [87] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/uri-usage-primer-2012-10-03/

>       [88] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/704

>       [89] http://www.w3.org/wiki/TagIssue57Proposal27/Background

>       [90]
> http://www.w3.org/wiki/index.php?title=TagIssue57Proposal27/Background&o

> ldid=61033
>       [91] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/uri-usage-primer-2012-10-03/

>       [92]
> http://www.w3.org/wiki/index.php?title=TagIssue57Proposal27&oldid=61086

>       [93] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2012Oct/0003.html

>       [94] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2012Oct/0021.html

>       [95] http://dbooth.org/2012/fyn/Booth-fyn.pdf

>       [96] http://dbooth.org/2010/ambiguity/paper.html

>       [97] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/objectives-matrix-20120930

>       [98] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/717

>       [99] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2012Sep/0009.html

>      [100] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/529

>      [101] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2011/03/31-minutes.html#item04

>      [102] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/717

>      [103] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2012/09/action-726

>      [104] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/tag-weekly

>      [105] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2012/06/13-minutes#item02

>      [106] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2012/06/14-minutes#item03

>      [107] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/objectives-matrix-20120930

>      [108] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2012/09/action-726

>      [109] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/726

>      [110] https://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/725

>      [111] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/692

>      [112] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/709

>      [113] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2012/04/26-minutes#item04

>      [114] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2012Apr/0105.html

>      [115] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2012/04/26-minutes#item04

>      [116] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/701

>      [117] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/702

>      [118] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2012Apr/0143.html

>      [119] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2012Apr/0147.html

>      [120] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2012Apr/0151.html

>      [121] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2012Apr/0153.html

>      [122] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/pendingreview

>      [123] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/

>      [124] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/overdue

>      [125] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/

>      [126] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/open

>      [127] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/

>      [128] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues/open

>      [129] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/669

>      [130] https://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/672

>      [131] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/478

>      [132] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/666

>
>
>      Noah Mendelsohn for the TAG
>      $Revision: 1.916 $ of $Date: 2012/10/04 00:24:16 $
>
>         [133]HTML5 Powered with CSS3 / Styling, and Semantics
>     [134]Valid CSS!
>
>      [133] http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=referer

>      [134] http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/check/referer

>
>

Received on Thursday, 4 October 2012 07:34:47 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 4 October 2012 07:34:47 GMT