W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > October 2012

Re: Editor's Draft of ISSUE-57 URI Usage Primer

From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2012 07:12:56 +0100
Cc: "www-tag@w3.org List" <www-tag@w3.org>
Message-Id: <619096AB-374E-44B7-8C3D-9DF3C90F293B@jenitennison.com>
To: John Kemp <john@jkemp.net>

On 3 Oct 2012, at 23:22, John Kemp wrote:

> On Oct 3, 2012, at 4:49 PM, Jeni Tennison wrote:
> 
>> Hi Noah, all,
>> 
>> An editor's draft of the "URI Usage Primer" is available at:
>> 
>> http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/uri-usage-primer-2012-10-03/
> 
> I like the concept of "landing page" as being a page which "describes" something else. 
> 
> The word 'page', however, makes me think of web page and thus HTML - not RDF, JSON, XML et al as mentioned as possibilities in the document. These are all types of "description", are they not? They describe the thing for which they are (if a web page?) the "landing page"?

Yes, they are still 'landing pages' even if they are not HTML pages. Do you have an alternative term? We could have a general term for resources that describe other things and use 'landing page' just for when they are in HTML, I guess. I'm not sure 'description' is the right term to use though.

> Should the document mention not only the "describes" relationship but also the "is-described-by" case?


Yes, I think that's partly within the TODO section on hash URIs, 303s etc (4.2.1) and partly in 4.3 as mentioned to Ashok.

Thanks for the comments!

Jeni
-- 
Jeni Tennison
http://www.jenitennison.com
Received on Thursday, 4 October 2012 06:13:22 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 4 October 2012 06:13:22 GMT