- From: トーレ エリクソン <tore.eriksson@po.rd.taisho.co.jp>
- Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:48:03 +0900
- To: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
- Cc: www-tag@w3.org
Hi David,
Although we differ on the point of Information Resources (surprise,
surprise), I think your proposal is quite similar to mine. I'd like you
to clarify one difference though. In section 3.23 you require
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
<http://example/toucan> rdfs:isDefinedBy <http://example/toucan> .
Why can't the representation be a URI definition even without this
statement? It seems to me that it being served as a 200 should be enough
to be sure of its validity.
Regards,
Tore Eriksson
(Sorry, resending since I forgot to cc the list)
_______________________________________________________________
_:this dc:creator [
foaf:name "Tore Eriksson",
"トーレ エリクソン"@jp;
foaf:mbox_sha1sum "2bd9291b301f112775e118f96eb63314594b1a86";
foaf:workplaceHomepage <http://www.taisho.co.jp/> ].
Received on Monday, 26 March 2012 07:48:37 UTC