W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > January 2012

Re: HTML5 proposes introduction of new family of URI schemes

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 09:49:50 +0100
Message-ID: <4F1E70AE.40005@gmx.de>
To: Jonathan A Rees <rees@mumble.net>
CC: Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com>, "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
On 2012-01-24 03:10, Jonathan A Rees wrote:
> I was wondering - is the registered handler supposed to work with all
> applications, or just web browsers? For example, mail readers, PDF
> viewers, document and spreadsheet composers - anything that exposes
> actionable hyperlinks. If so then this is really an OS-level feature
> and I wonder what it's doing in an HTML specification. (Especially
> since browsers aren't the only containers for Javascript... right?)
> What's the intended mechanism - the OS looks at the browser
> configuration, or vice versa, or it doesn't matter? If not then why
> not? Can general users tell the difference between a browser and the
> rest of their application software suite?
>
> I also note that this is an awful lot like HTTP proxy server
> configuration and "parental controls", both of which interfere with
> URI handling. Maybe there useful analogies to the configuration and
> security experience in those areas.
>
> Jonathan

To make this work as expected, the browser will need to be registered 
OS-wide as handler for the URI scheme. It then can "proxy" the request 
to the registered web page.

Best regards, Julian
Received on Tuesday, 24 January 2012 08:50:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:48:44 GMT