W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > January 2012

Re: ACTION-350: Best practice for referring to specifications which may update

From: Karl Dubost <karld@opera.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 13:51:29 -0500
Message-Id: <6FE331E6-3CB0-4611-A231-4C112BEF8050@opera.com>
Cc: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>, "C. M. Sperberg-McQueen" <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com>, "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
To: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>

Le 18 janv. 2012 à 08:54, Larry Masinter a écrit :
> Questions:
> What do editors of spec A write, what should reviewers of spec
> A assume, what should implementors of spec A do, when the editors
> of spec B issue B', an updated spec.

Some input

Karl Dubost - http://dev.opera.com/
Developer Relations, Opera Software
Received on Wednesday, 18 January 2012 18:52:22 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:48:44 GMT