Melvin, While the TAG might resist picking winners and losers in an unclear technology battle as a short-term strategy, I think AWWW suffers because it assumes trust too many places. For updating the AWWW we have, I've been thinking somewhat the opposite: that we need at least a model and a framework for talking about trust, and to encompass the different ways in which trust affects architecture. > I think what's key is that the AWWW resist pressures to pick winners and losers in trust. Why is this 'key'? > There should be a loose coupling between the trust system employed and web. There should be a coupling. Why loose? Ø When trust systems get closely coupled to an architecture, it is potentially problematic. Everything is potentially problematic, why this one in particular? > IMHO it should even be possible to use an 'honor system'. An honor system is a kind of simple trust model. Why not?
Received on Monday, 17 December 2012 01:00:14 UTC