W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > October 2011

Re: 'parallel properties' reference?

From: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 17:05:06 -0400
To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
Cc: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>, www-tag@w3.org
Message-ID: <1319490306.2178.90729.camel@dbooth-laptop>
FYI, I also described the "parallel properties" approach (in 2006),
though at that time I called it the "shadow ontology" approach:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2006Jan/0171.html
TimBL argued against it here:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2007Jun/0012.html
The refinement that Sandro described below is a kind of a combination of
that and the "Multiple-Sense Approach" also described at:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2006Jan/0171.html

David


On Mon, 2011-10-24 at 16:13 -0400, Sandro Hawke wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-10-24 at 16:04 -0400, Jonathan Rees wrote:
> > I'm looking for something explaining how 'parallel properties' work,
> > mentioned here:
> > 
> > http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2011/06/07-minutes.html
> > 
> > Tim: Parallel properties - in the open graph protocol on Facebook you
> > get a page about a movie. The RDF references "" (empty URI) is of type
> > "Movie" etc... Sandro says - since they use their own namespace ogp:
> > then we know that ogp: usage means that the referent is the principal
> > subject of the resource referenced.
> 
> This is what I wrote, introducing the concept (in a larger context):
> 
> http://decentralyze.com/2010/11/10/simplified-rdf/
> 
> Not many people expressed interest in this work, so it's become a low
> priority for me.    I still think it's a good idea, though.
> 
>     -- Sandro
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

-- 
David Booth, Ph.D.
http://dbooth.org/

Opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily
reflect those of his employer.
Received on Monday, 24 October 2011 21:05:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:48:40 GMT