W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > June 2011

Re: TAG and IAB discussion on security topic:

From: Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com>
Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2011 16:49:25 -0400
Message-ID: <4DEA9A55.4080400@arcanedomain.com>
To: Larry Masinter <masinter@gmail.com>
CC: 'John Kemp' <john@jkemp.net>, www-tag@w3.org, iab@iab.org, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>, tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org, Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>, 'Thomas Roessler' <tlr@w3.org>
I agree. In fact, FWIW, I would suggest prioritizing this ahead of things 
like versioning.

Noah

On 6/4/2011 4:48 PM, Larry Masinter wrote:
> One proposed slight modification to the agenda of the TAG/IAB
> call/meeting for next Tuesday is to be specific about one security
> topic:
>
> A specific important area of collaboration between IETF and W3C is
> around web security, with both a IETF WEBSEC working group
> http://tools.ietf.org/wg/websec/charters as well as W3C work on web
> security in W3C groups for HTML and within the W3C security activity.
>
>
> Within the TAG, some work started on some architectural writing around
> web security:  http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2011/02/security-web.html
> (SUGGESTED PREREADING).
>
> One of the actions is to figure out how to move this work forward
> within the TAG, elsewhere in W3C, or jointly with IAB or with other
> groups.
>
> How does IAB handle architectural guidelines for Security? Is this
> something that should be developed jointly between IETF/W3C? As joint
> work between TAG and IAB, or within the IETF WEBSEC working group?
>
>   Re: ACTION-515 and ACTION-516
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Saturday, 4 June 2011 20:49:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:48:35 GMT