W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > November 2010

Re: image/svg+xml, was: Feedback on Internet Media Types and the Web

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2010 20:04:41 +0100
Message-ID: <4CD849C9.1050200@gmx.de>
To: Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com>
CC: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>, Larry Masinter <LMM@acm.org>, "www-tag@w3.org WG" <www-tag@w3.org>, Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>, MURATA Makoto <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp>
On 08.11.2010 19:59, Noah Mendelsohn wrote:
> Julian Reschke wrote:
>  > Which reminds me that it may be time for the TAG to look into the
>  > image/sxg+xml issue.
> I assume that's a typo for svg+xml?


> I'd first be curious to hear what some of those responsible for RFC 3023
> bis think. I'm copying Chris and Murata-san. To me, having a +xml type
> that's sometimes not XML seems bogus, but let's see what others say.

Getting more eyes on this wouldn't hurt.

Best regards, Julian
Received on Monday, 8 November 2010 19:05:22 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:48:29 GMT