W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > November 2010

Re: "tdb" and "duri" URI schemes...

From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 09:31:59 +0000
Message-ID: <4CD3CF0F.108@webr3.org>
To: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
CC: Graham Klyne <GK-lists@ninebynine.org>, Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>, "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
Larry Masinter wrote:
> Almost all of the use cases for tdb I can think of need a timestamp,
> even when the description isn't varying (such as with data:).

agree, but also see a big need for the non-dated semantic indirection on 
the web, especially in linked data territories, thus looking for some 
way to make that possible, without another 5-10 year lead time.

> And duri with data: doesn't make sense to me.

Likewise to some extent, however, with duri:


and non temporally bound:


Regardless of this though, definitely need fragments in the URIs, 
encoded or not.

Thanks again for your time and consideration, Best,

Received on Friday, 5 November 2010 09:39:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:33:08 UTC