- From: Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com>
- Date: Sun, 02 May 2010 19:34:40 -0400
- To: "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
- CC: "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
I believe that our scribe for 22 April, Henry Thompson, has been quite
busy this week, so I've taken a pass at formatting the minutes from that
call. They are available at [1], and in text-only form below, and they
will be on the agenda for approval during this weeks's call. Thank you.
Noah
[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2010/04/22-minutes
[1]W3C
[1] http://www.w3.org/
- DRAFT -
TAG telcon
22 Apr 2010
[2]Agenda
[2] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2010/04/22-agenda.html
See also: [3]IRC log
[3] http://www.w3.org/2010/04/22-tagmem-irc
Attendees
Present
Dan Appelquist, Dan Connolly, Ashok Malhotra, Noah
Mendelsohn, Henry Thompson
Regrets
Tim Berners-Lee (partial), Larry Masinter, T.V. Raman,
Jonathan Rees
Chair
Noah Mendelsohn
Scribe
Henry S. Thompson
Contents
* [4]Topics
1. [5]Convene
2. [6]London local arrangements
3. [7]Overdue action items
4. [8]ACTION-407: HTML WG and media type registration
5. [9]ACTION-354 Client-side storage
6. [10]WebApps document strategy
7. [11]ACTION-392 RDFa and client-side storage
8. [12]ACTION-401 ask for review of webapp taxonomy
9. [13]ISSUE-24 (contentTypeOverride-24): Mobile Web
"Guidelines for Web Content Transformation Proxies"
10. [14]Review of PENDING REVIEW Action Items
* [15]Summary of Action Items
_________________________________________________________
Convene
<DanC> scribenick: DanC
NM: reminder next week is cancelled; next telcon is 6 May
<ht> HST: Regrets for 6 May
NM: DanC, can you scribe 6 May?
DanC: I think so... will check in detail
<ht> NM: Minutes from 15 April. . .
<DKA> My belated regrets for last week.
<DKA> I am playing the volcano card.
DanC: +1 approve
[16]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2010/04/15-minutes.html
[16] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2010/04/15-minutes.html
<scribe> scribenick: ht
NM: Minutes for 15 April approved
RESOLUTION: Minutes for 15 April approved
London local arrangements
<johnk__> not sure I can attend even the meeting yet (Note: JK
subsequently sent regrets)
DKA: I sent email to tag mailing list with local arrangements
details
Overdue action items
<noah> [17]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/overdue
[17] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/overdue
NM: Having the due dates so out of sync with reality makes life hard
for the chair in planning, please fix this.
<noah>
[18]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/overdue?sort=owne
r
[18] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/overdue?sort=owner
<DanC> action-390?
<trackbot> ACTION-390 -- Daniel Appelquist to review ISSUE-58 and
suggest next steps, due 2010-03-03 -- due 2010-03-17 -- OPEN
<trackbot> [19]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/390
[19] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/390
DKA: I need to review this, keep it open, likewise for my others.
<DanC> action-390 due next week
<trackbot> ACTION-390 Review ISSUE-58 and suggest next steps, due
2010-03-03 due date now next week
action-408?
<trackbot> ACTION-408 -- Daniel Appelquist to look into next steps
on a workshop around device APIs, privacy etc. with tlr -- due
2010-03-31 -- OPEN
<trackbot> [20]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/408
[20] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/408
DKA: This is done, I've been working on a workshop, draft call for
participation
... link coming
<DanC> sounds done-done to me.
NM: Thanks DKA, that's done
close action-408
<trackbot> ACTION-408 Look into next steps on a workshop around
device APIs, privacy etc. with tlr closed
scribe: vodafone will host in same week as DAP f2f -- 12/13 July
NM: Any other TAG members to attend?
. . . [none]
<DanC> ACTION-420 due next week
<trackbot> ACTION-420 What is different about xhtml basic 1.1 (in
particular re: namespaces) due date now next week
<DanC> (I interpret "keep this open" as "due next week" by default)
<DanC> ACTION-116 due + 8 weeks
<trackbot> ACTION-116 Align the tabulator internal vocabulary with
the vocabulary in the rules
[21]http://esw.w3.org/topic/AwwswDboothsRules,getting changes to
either as needed. due date now + 8 weeks
[21] http://esw.w3.org/topic/AwwswDboothsRules
<johnk> ACTION-399?
<trackbot> ACTION-399 -- John Kemp to prepare F2F discussion of
sniffing, being sure to check status of other pertinent actions --
due 2010-03-18 -- PENDINGREVIEW
<trackbot> [22]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/399
[22] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/399
close action-399
<trackbot> ACTION-399 Prepare F2F discussion of sniffing, being sure
to check status of other pertinent actions closed
action-340?
<trackbot> ACTION-340 -- John Kemp to review XHR and UMP together
and provide comments to TAG as relevant -- due 2010-03-10 -- OPEN
<trackbot> [23]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/340
[23] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/340
<DanC> (going on on which list?)
NM: JK to prepare a discussion for the May 6 call
<DanC> action-340?
<trackbot> ACTION-340 -- John Kemp to summarize recent discussion
around XHR and UMP -- due 2010-05-04 -- OPEN
<trackbot> [24]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/340
[24] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/340
close action-215
<trackbot> ACTION-215 Send minutes of 15 Apr TAG teleconference to
www-tag for review closed
<DanC> action-384: most recent msg seems to be
[25]http://www.w3.org/mid/E345E885-AC39-4E16-B8B3-982513A303A2@jkemp
.net 22 Mar
[25]
http://www.w3.org/mid/E345E885-AC39-4E16-B8B3-982513A303A2@jkemp.net
<trackbot> ACTION-384 CVS usage edits notes added
<DKA> FYI this is the CfP for the privacy workshop (reference
ACTION-408): [26]http://www.w3.org/2010/api-privacy-ws/
[26] http://www.w3.org/2010/api-privacy-ws/
<DanC> action-408: CFP (draft?) is
[27]http://www.w3.org/2010/api-privacy-ws/
[27] http://www.w3.org/2010/api-privacy-ws/
<trackbot> ACTION-408 Look into next steps on a workshop around
device APIs, privacy etc. with tlr notes added
action-401?
<trackbot> ACTION-401 -- Ashok Malhotra to ask WebApps working group
to review John Kemp's taxonomy -- due 2010-03-18 -- OPEN
<trackbot> [28]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/401
[28] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/401
AM: One reply came back
action-401 pending review
<DanC> action-401?
<trackbot> ACTION-401 -- Ashok Malhotra to ask WebApps working group
to review John Kemp's taxonomy -- due 2010-03-18 -- PENDINGREVIEW
<trackbot> [29]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/401
[29] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/401
<johnk> this is the email I sent with the CVS diff of edits related
to ACTION-384
[30]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2010Mar/0054.html
[30] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2010Mar/0054.html
<DanC> action-213 due 4 May
<trackbot> ACTION-213 Prepare 22 Apr weekly teleconference agenda
due date now 4 May
<DanC> action-370?
<trackbot> ACTION-370 -- Henry S. Thompson to hST to send a
revised-as-amended version of
[31]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2009Dec/0068.html to
the HTTP bis list on behalf of the TAG -- due 2010-04-08 -- OPEN
[31] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2009Dec/0068.html
<trackbot> [32]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/370
[32] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/370
<DanC> action-370 due +2 weeks
<trackbot> ACTION-370 HST to send a revised-as-amended version of
[33]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2009Dec/0068.html to
the HTTP bis list on behalf of the TAG due date now +2 weeks
[33] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2009Dec/0068.html
NM: HST to catch up/roll forward his behind-actions ASAP
ACTION-407: HTML WG and media type registration
NM: Did you close this last week by mistake?
(Tim Berners-Lee joins the call)
<DanC> action-407?
<trackbot> ACTION-407 -- Henry S. Thompson to propose an update to
DanC's prose from
[34]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Feb/0878.htm
l to explicitly reference or encorporate the HTML history, similarly
to the way 2854 does -- due 2010-04-22 -- PENDINGREVIEW
[34] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Feb/0878.html
<trackbot> [35]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/407
[35] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/407
HST: Let's reopen it and keep it PENDING REVIEW
... So there have been several replies to my email [link coming]
<noah> Please paste link to public-html thread
<DanC>
[36]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Apr/thread.h
tml#msg1052
[36]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Apr/thread.html#msg1052
<DanC> works for me: "Labeling a
<DanC> resource with the text/html type asserts that the resource is
<DanC> to be interpreted as an HTML document using the HTML syntax,
and
<DanC> that it conforms either to this specification or to an
earlier
<DanC> HTML specification.
<DanC> "
<DanC> (no conformance claim? that seems silly to me)
<scribe> scribenick: noah
HT: Serving as text/html makes >no< conformance claims...it just
says, use this spec
DC: That's not a conformance claim?
HT: No. I took it that the wording we carefully agreed had the
intent "use this spec"; whether you think there's an implicit claim
of conformance...well, we didn't say that.
<DanC> action-407: hst plans to reply on his own behalf to the
thread
[37]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Apr/thread.h
tml#msg1052 and leave it to the group to decide in due course
[37]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Apr/thread.html#msg1052
<trackbot> ACTION-407 Propose an update to DanC's prose from
[38]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Feb/0878.htm
l to explicitly reference or encorporate the HTML history, similarly
to the way 2854 does notes added
[38] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Feb/0878.html
<ht> scribenick: ht
ACTION-354 Client-side storage
AM: WebApps WG is publishing a number of specs
... We have agreed to look at the motivation -- what's behind them
... The WAWG have a model of how that world is going to evolve
... but it's not completely spelled out
... Two requirements: 1) You should be able to 'run' a WebApp
offline;
... 2) You should be able to run a WebApp with data from more than
... So they have a spec. callled "Programmable Caching", which lets
you bring in data from multiple websites, cache it, purge it, use
it, etc.
... which is quite well-motivated.
... The other spec. we talked about and I have looked at are two
database specs: Light Database and ?? Database
... These seem less well-motivated
... I asked Ian Hickson why they were doing these specs
<DanC> (sorry, I can't pin down the 2 DB specs among the blizzard on
[39]http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/PubStatus )
[39] http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/PubStatus
AM: Ian replied it was a replacement for cookies
<Ashok> "Cookies are unreliable, sent to the server, have a small
quota, and have a terrible API. Web Storage is intended to fix
that."
NM: I understand the cookie overlap
... but when I see these database things, I think -- cookies for
identifying me to gmail, but databases to actually _store_ my email
... which seems to go a lot further
AM: Right, that's the offline operation side of things
NM: The other thing about cookies is their special status wrt HTTP
and client-server interaction
<DanC> (did anybody take the ball for writing about this stuff?
darn; we didn't scribble names into
[40]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2010/03/webappsoutline.html ; gotta
look back over
[41]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2010/03/26-minutes.html#item03 )
[40] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2010/03/webappsoutline.html
[41] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2010/03/26-minutes.html#item03
AM: These specs are very high-functionality, with a lot of standard
DB transactional stuff including commit and rollback
<DanC> (ah... "AM: I'll contribute on section 5, app state")
AM: Summarizing: replace cookies, offline storage enabling offline
execution; data from multiple websites
WebApps document strategy
NM: At the f2f, we agreed to try to find people to pick up bits of
the outline we produced
... and start writing at least a summary of the state of play, as in
TV's [#-in-URI]
... So in particular, AM, are you willing to go on the list against
section 5: Application State
AM: Yes
<scribe> ACTION: Ashok to propose a plan for his contributions to
section 5: Client-side state [recorded in
[42]http://www.w3.org/2010/04/22-tagmem-irc]
[42] http://www.w3.org/2010/04/22-tagmem-irc
<trackbot> Created ACTION-430 - Propose a plan for his contributions
to section 5: Client-side state [on Ashok Malhotra - due
2010-04-29].
<DanC> action-xxx due +4 weeks
action-409 due +1 week
<trackbot> ACTION-409 Run Larry's plan for closing IRIEverywhere by
the XML Core WG due date now +1 week
action-430 due +1 week
<trackbot> ACTION-430 Propose a plan for his contributions to
section 5: Client-side state due date now +1 week
DC: TBL, when did you write the Tabulator?
TBL: Three years ago, maybe?
DC: I wonder if it might be worth trying to get from you what you
learned from that exercise
... about security, storage, . . .
... Maybe via an interview?
TBL: About . . .
DC: Javascript, security limitations
<noah> I'm curious what the result of the interview would be: a)
input to the TAG work b) magazine article c) ???
TBL: Started out as a webapp, turned into a local app == a firefox
extension, because that got it inside the trust envelop
... You should talk to James Hollenbach <jambo@csail.mit.edu> about
this, he's been taking it forward
... using CORS
<DanC>
[43]http://dig.csail.mit.edu/2005/ajar/ajaw/people/Overview.html Jim
Hollenbach
[43] http://dig.csail.mit.edu/2005/ajar/ajaw/people/Overview.html
<timbl_> <[44]http://web.mit.edu/jambo/www/foaf.rdf#jambo>
[44] http://web.mit.edu/jambo/www/foaf.rdf#jambo>
NM: So if we did such an interview, would it be as an input to our
thinking about WebAppArchitecture, or as a publication in its own
right?
DC: more the latter, see the series Ian Jacobs has been doing
NM: Next steps?
DC: I found out what I wanted to. . .
<DanC> pointer, ashok?
AM: We did get one reply to our request to review our webapps
taxonomy
<DanC> action-401?
<trackbot> ACTION-401 -- Ashok Malhotra to ask WebApps working group
to review John Kemp's taxonomy -- due 2010-03-18 -- PENDINGREVIEW
<trackbot> [45]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/401
[45] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/401
<Ashok>
[46]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2010Mar/0072.html
[46] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2010Mar/0072.html
<DanC> close action-354
<trackbot> ACTION-354 Review client side storage apis (web simple
storage etc.), looking for architectural issues or other critical
problems... or interesting design features the TAG should know about
closed
NM: [we'll come to that under next+1 agendum]
close ACTION-354
<trackbot> ACTION-354 Review client side storage apis (web simple
storage etc.), looking for architectural issues or other critical
problems... or interesting design features the TAG should know about
closed
ACTION-392 RDFa and client-side storage
<noah> DC: looked at Zotoro? tool, and saw they were using Tabulator
as data store
ACTION-392?
<trackbot> ACTION-392 -- Dan Connolly to look into using new client
side storage APIs as an RDFa or tabulator data store -- due
2010-03-17 -- PENDINGREVIEW
<trackbot> [47]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/392
[47] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/392
DC: So I thought there was a connection, and I sent email
... but the reply was not positive
[48]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2010Feb/0152.html
[48] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2010Feb/0152.html
DC: TBL, are the client-side storage APIs any use for storing
triples?
TBL: Some kind of RDF API standardisation is probably needed -- RDF
is 10 years old, maybe an XG, we need to move on this
<DanC> close action-392
<trackbot> ACTION-392 Look into using new client side storage APIs
as an RDFa or tabulator data store closed
close ACTION-392
<trackbot> ACTION-392 Look into using new client side storage APIs
as an RDFa or tabulator data store closed
ACTION-401 ask for review of webapp taxonomy
<noah> Email from Ashok to Web Apps
<noah> Response:
[49]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2010Mar/0072.html
[49] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2010Mar/0072.html
JK: I understand the poster's concern about my use of the word
'trust', but I think it was OK in the narrow sense I used it,
... but I also agree that the larger issue has not been completely
covered
<DanC> (this widget stuff is crossing various sorts of finish lines;
e.g. [50]http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/CR-widgets-access-20100420/
Widget Access Request Policy )
[50] http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/CR-widgets-access-20100420/
AM: So yes, he's asking for more detail on something which was just
a bullet point
<noah> Dan, do you think we need to do anything on that?
HST: But it doesn't compromise the taxonomy?
AM: Right, it does not.
close ACTION-401
<trackbot> ACTION-401 Ask WebApps working group to review John
Kemp's taxonomy
DC: Does this connect with our outline and writing?
<DanC> stuck it where? pointer?
AM: I took comments from the email and added them to the WebApps
outline under point 1 Architecture
DC: Where?
<Ashok> [51]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2010/04/WebApps.html
[51] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2010/04/WebApps.html
<DanC> [52]http://www.w3.org/2005/03/28-editor-style.html
[52] http://www.w3.org/2005/03/28-editor-style.html
<DanC> action-401: note
[53]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2010/04/WebApps.html
[53] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2010/04/WebApps.html
<trackbot> ACTION-401 Ask WebApps working group to review John
Kemp's taxonomy notes added
<DanC> action-352?
<trackbot> ACTION-352 -- John Kemp to integrate whiteboard drawings
into a prose document about ways to distribute applications -- due
2010-03-08 -- PENDINGREVIEW
<trackbot> [54]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/352
[54] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/352
<Ashok> I cannot cahnge the access right -- needs team priviledges
<noah> John, should we close 352
<DanC> john, NM thinks maybe it's just an admin error that 352 isn't
closed
<noah> should we have closed it at the F2F?
<johnk__> I did ACTION-352, but, at the F2F we decided to keep the
action open
<DanC> scribenick: DanC
<johnk__> as a placeholder for me to do more work on it
<johnk__> in the WebApps subject
ok
<noah> OK, with what due date and what next goals, please?
<noah> Anyway, please update as you see fit. We'll move on if you
can't get back on the phone.
<johnk__> ACTION-352?
<trackbot> ACTION-352 -- John Kemp to integrate whiteboard drawings
into a prose document about ways to distribute applications -- due
2010-03-08 -- PENDINGREVIEW
<trackbot> [55]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/352
[55] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/352
action-352 due +2 weeks
<trackbot> ACTION-352 Integrate whiteboard drawings into a prose
document about ways to distribute applications due date now +2 weeks
<johnk__> hmm, OK, so, I'll change the due date and add relevant
notes
thanks.
<DKA> action-376?
<trackbot> ACTION-376 -- Daniel Appelquist to send to www-tag a
pointer to and brief summary of Mobile Web Best Practices working
group's "Guidelines for Web Content Transformation Proxies" and its
implications for content sniffing:
[56]http://www.w3.org/TR/ct-guidelines/ -- due 2010-03-17 --
PENDINGREVIEW
[56] http://www.w3.org/TR/ct-guidelines/
<trackbot> [57]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/376
[57] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/376
<johnk__> but I'm staying on IRC
ISSUE-24 (contentTypeOverride-24): Mobile Web "Guidelines for Web
Content Transformation Proxies"
<noah>
[58]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2010Feb/0171.html
[58] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2010Feb/0171.html
<noah> DC: I looked and was curious whether the guidelines should
cite IETF work.
DKA: yes, this is done
<noah> DKA: Yes, I had a discussion with XXX and Larry, and the net
was that Larry was satisfied that the correct material was ref'd
DKA: yes, we finished that discussion with Larry about citing the
IETF material
close ACTION-376
<trackbot> ACTION-376 Send to www-tag a pointer to and brief summary
of Mobile Web Best Practices working group's "Guidelines for Web
Content Transformation Proxies" and its implications for content
sniffing: [59]http://www.w3.org/TR/ct-guidelines/ closed
[59] http://www.w3.org/TR/ct-guidelines/
<noah> DC: OK, Larry can come back if he still has a problem
<noah> close ACTION-376
<trackbot> ACTION-376 Send to www-tag a pointer to and brief summary
of Mobile Web Best Practices working group's "Guidelines for Web
Content Transformation Proxies" and its implications for content
sniffing: [60]http://www.w3.org/TR/ct-guidelines/ closed
[60] http://www.w3.org/TR/ct-guidelines/
Review of PENDING REVIEW Action Items
<noah>
[61]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/pendingreview
[61] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/pendingreview
<noah> [62]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/322 - Ask
for W3C resources on writing on hyperlinking
[62] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/322
NM: so next time for this one?
DC: yes
action-353?
<trackbot> ACTION-353 -- Noah Mendelsohn to do just a bit of work
framing some issues around identification for Ajax apps (remembering
the merged maps use case) -- due 2010-03-08 -- PENDINGREVIEW
<trackbot> [63]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/353
[63] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/353
<noah> close ACTION-353
<trackbot> ACTION-353 Do just a bit of work framing some issues
around identification for Ajax apps (remembering the merged maps use
case) closed
NM: I think we did this at the ftf; Raman is following up
DanC: re 379... it's certainly published... but oh yeah... we
weren't sure if we should follow up re lack of schemas
action-384?
<trackbot> ACTION-384 -- Noah Mendelsohn to CVS usage edits -- due
2010-03-04 -- PENDINGREVIEW
<trackbot> [64]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/384
[64] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/384
action-384?
<trackbot> ACTION-384 -- Noah Mendelsohn to cVS usage edits -- due
2010-05-11
<trackbot> [65]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/384
[65] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/384
NM: yes, 407 and 424 are properly pending
<noah> HENRY ===> PLEASE REMOVE URI FOR PRIVACY CFP FROM PUBLISHED
MINUTES
ADJOURN
s,FYI this is the CfP for the privacy workshop (reference
ACTION-408): [66]http://www.w3.org/2010/api-privacy-ws/,,
[66] http://www.w3.org/2010/api-privacy-ws/
s,action-408: CFP (draft?) is
[67]http://www.w3.org/2010/api-privacy-ws/,,
[67] http://www.w3.org/2010/api-privacy-ws/
<timbl> Couldn't fd any evidence for Royal Mail saying you couldn't
link to
"We constantly change and update sections of our site, and want to
ensure that you and your customers continue to get the latest
information and services you need. Therefore, please donāt provide
links to pages on our website other than those listed above." --
[68]http://www.royalmail.com/portal/rm/content1?catId=28000674&media
Id=28100668
[68]
http://www.royalmail.com/portal/rm/content1?catId=28000674&mediaId=28100668
Summary of Action Items
[NEW] ACTION: Ashok to propose a plan for his contributions to
section 5: Client-side state [recorded in
[69]http://www.w3.org/2010/04/22-tagmem-irc]
[69] http://www.w3.org/2010/04/22-tagmem-irc
[End of minutes]
_________________________________________________________
Minutes formatted by David Booth's [70]scribe.perl version 1.134
([71]CVS log)
$Date: 2010/05/02 23:31:38 $
[70] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
[71] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
Received on Sunday, 2 May 2010 23:35:11 UTC