- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2010 11:53:19 -0700
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, "noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com" <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>, ashok malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>, "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
On Apr 1, 2010, at 11:50 AM, Dan Connolly wrote: > On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 16:57 +0000, Paul Cotton wrote: >> How does this relate to the TAG's offer in the following Jan 29 >> message: >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2010Jan/0114.html >> >> Does this mean that the TAG failed to communicate a subsequent >> "change of heart" about writing a change proposal to the HTML WG? > > We certainly didn't meet the 31 March deadline. > > The lack of communication is (at least in part) because > any change of heart wasn't entirely conscious; i.e. the > TAG didn't explicitly change its decision. > > We just spent the bulk of today's meeting trying to figure > out a next step, but the result was inconclusive. > > Personally, I'm somewhere between hopeful that we'll get > a change proposal together close enough to the 31 March > deadline for the HTML WG's purposes on the one hand, > and resigned that we won't on the other. If we don't get a revised deadline soon, our likely action will be to mark the issue closed without prejudice. This means we will no longer consider it a blocker for Last Call and presume that it is postponed to the next version of HTML, but we will be willing to reopen it when and if a change proposal is actually delivered. Regards, Maciej
Received on Thursday, 1 April 2010 18:53:52 UTC