W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > October 2009

Re: TAG issue review - JAR

From: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 15:21:19 -0400
Message-ID: <760bcb2a0910191221h2ad85f7bh736d1da553e9acc7@mail.gmail.com>
To: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
Cc: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>, "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 2:36 PM,  <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> Thank you. Just going over backlogged email, I'm reminded of your interest
> in CORs.  If you want to see the TAG pursue this, please either make a
> proposal, or find the shepherd for whichever issue(s) you consider
> pertinent and work with him.

I've suggested that we wait until the WG requests review of a working
draft. If they haven't ironed out their internal differences around
stack introspection and confused deputy attacks by then, the TAG
should take a hard look at what the WG is getting themselves into,
since the WG is creating what could end up being a central piece of
web architecture, and a magnet for attacks.

Of course it would be nice if someone else on the TAG looked at the
editor's draft and the debate and not wait for a working draft, just
so we have as many minds on this as we can afford.

I wouldn't mind if there were an issue to track this under.

Jonathan

> Jonathan's note reminds me:  while I'm trying to use the shepherds as
> focal points for each issue, what I really want is to be sure we're not
> dropping the ball on anything.  If you know of something that you feel the
> TAG should be working on in coming weeks/months, please work with the
> appropriate shepherd to be sure we're tracking it, or else alert me that
> you couldn't find a suitable issue/shepherd.  Thank you.
>
> Noah
>
> --------------------------------------
> Noah Mendelsohn
> IBM Corporation
> One Rogers Street
> Cambridge, MA 02142
> 1-617-693-4036
> --------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
> 10/18/2009 06:57 PM
>
>        To:     Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
>        cc:     "noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com" <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>,
> "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
>        Subject:        TAG issue review - JAR
>
>
> Following Larry's lead, I'll report on my TAG issues...
>
> AFAIK the only issue I'm supposed to be supervising is ISSUE-57, and I
> already wrote a summary of its condition:
>
>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2009Jun/0057.html
>
> Nothing much has changed since then, although I should mention a
> couple of things:
>
> - The HTTP semantics ("AWWSW") work is being tracked under this issue
> (and the group has worked on redirection semantics from time to time,
> with little convergence)
>
> - The question of correct use of content negotiation (especially
> around RDF) is hanging, and we've been asked to make a determination
> on it. I think this is being tracked under ISSUE-57, probably because
> we didn't want to open an issue for it (we probably should)
>
> - I think the TAG ought to take httpRange-14 forward, as Roy's cryptic
> email has numerous bugs in it and I don't consider the SWEO note to be
> an adequate specification. I'd be happy to work on a SHORT finding on
> the subject - if today's TAG can manage to stand by some form of the
> 2005 decision, which seems to be in question.
>
> Jonathan
>
>
>
Received on Monday, 19 October 2009 19:21:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:48:17 GMT