W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > November 2009

Re: f2f Agenda Planning -- Issue 62

From: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 11:19:59 -0500
To: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
Cc: ashok.malhotra@oracle.com, "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
Message-ID: <OF6A3D9E94.A4878347-ON8525766D.005997A3-8525766D.0059B8E8@lotus.com>
Jonathan Rees writes:

> A deadline later than Dec 1 for either metadata OR HTTP 
> semantics would help me out quite a bit.

I suppose the two are related to a point, but given that we've identified 
metadata as a big theme for the TAG, my leaning would be to suggest 
delaying HTTP semantics as necessary to get preparation on metadata going 
into the F2F.  Thank you.


Noah Mendelsohn 
IBM Corporation
One Rogers Street
Cambridge, MA 02142

Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
Sent by: www-tag-request@w3.org
11/13/2009 10:29 AM
        To:     ashok.malhotra@oracle.com
        cc:     "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>, (bcc: Noah 
        Subject:        Re: f2f Agenda Planning -- Issue 62

Yes, I have this as an action (ACTION-282, due date now put at Dec 1).
I am still hoping to make a start on this but some help would be
welcome - it turns out Dec 1 is simultaneously a deadline for this,
for HTTP semantics, and for reports on two of my non-W3C projects, so
I'm going to be overwhelmed between now and then.  A deadline later
than Dec 1 for either metadata OR HTTP semantics would help me out
quite a bit.


On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 2:43 PM, ashok malhotra
<ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> wrote:
> Issue 62 is about Uniform Access to Metadata.
> http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues/62
> My take on the landscape is that we now have several mechanisms for 
> to Metadata
> (Link Header, Link, Site-Meta, RDFa) which we are reasonably satisfied 
> and what we need is
> a document that ties them all together and explains what should be used 
> what situations with examples, etc.
> Jonathan had taken an action to start work on such a document.  See
> http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/282
> If we could have a draft to discuss at the f2f, that would be wonderful.
> As I told some of you, I ran into Mark Nottingham at the TPAC and we 
> about a document
> to tie the threads of Metadata access together.  Mark said he was 
> in writing such a document but
> was constrained by time availability etc.  I have not followed up with 
> because, I think, the TAG should
> first decide what we want to do in the area.
> --
> All the best, Ashok
Received on Friday, 13 November 2009 16:20:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:33:04 UTC