W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > November 2009

Re: f2f Agenda Planning -- Issue 62

From: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 11:19:59 -0500
To: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
Cc: ashok.malhotra@oracle.com, "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
Message-ID: <OF6A3D9E94.A4878347-ON8525766D.005997A3-8525766D.0059B8E8@lotus.com>
Jonathan Rees writes:

> A deadline later than Dec 1 for either metadata OR HTTP 
> semantics would help me out quite a bit.

I suppose the two are related to a point, but given that we've identified 
metadata as a big theme for the TAG, my leaning would be to suggest 
delaying HTTP semantics as necessary to get preparation on metadata going 
into the F2F.  Thank you.

Noah

--------------------------------------
Noah Mendelsohn 
IBM Corporation
One Rogers Street
Cambridge, MA 02142
1-617-693-4036
--------------------------------------








Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
Sent by: www-tag-request@w3.org
11/13/2009 10:29 AM
 
        To:     ashok.malhotra@oracle.com
        cc:     "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>, (bcc: Noah 
Mendelsohn/Cambridge/IBM)
        Subject:        Re: f2f Agenda Planning -- Issue 62


Yes, I have this as an action (ACTION-282, due date now put at Dec 1).
I am still hoping to make a start on this but some help would be
welcome - it turns out Dec 1 is simultaneously a deadline for this,
for HTTP semantics, and for reports on two of my non-W3C projects, so
I'm going to be overwhelmed between now and then.  A deadline later
than Dec 1 for either metadata OR HTTP semantics would help me out
quite a bit.

Jonathan

On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 2:43 PM, ashok malhotra
<ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> wrote:
> Issue 62 is about Uniform Access to Metadata.
> http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues/62
> My take on the landscape is that we now have several mechanisms for 
access
> to Metadata
> (Link Header, Link, Site-Meta, RDFa) which we are reasonably satisfied 
with
> and what we need is
> a document that ties them all together and explains what should be used 
in
> what situations with examples, etc.
>
> Jonathan had taken an action to start work on such a document.  See
> http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/282
> If we could have a draft to discuss at the f2f, that would be wonderful.
>
> As I told some of you, I ran into Mark Nottingham at the TPAC and we 
talked
> about a document
> to tie the threads of Metadata access together.  Mark said he was 
interested
> in writing such a document but
> was constrained by time availability etc.  I have not followed up with 
Mark
> because, I think, the TAG should
> first decide what we want to do in the area.
> --
> All the best, Ashok
>
>
Received on Friday, 13 November 2009 16:20:34 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:48:18 GMT