W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > June 2009

Re: prefer to defer "widget:" discussion

From: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 11:31:26 -0400
To: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
Cc: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>, www-tag <www-tag@w3.org>
Message-ID: <OF7DC03394.EA5B610B-ON852575DD.0054B571-852575DD.00552172@lotus.com>
Larry Masinter wrote:

> I think the F2F agenda is pretty full, and that the document
> produced:
> 
> http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-uri/
> 
> is an early draft. While there may well be architectural issues
> that the TAG could discuss, I think they will be difficult to uncover
> without more preparation, and suggest postponing TAG discussion 
> on the topic.

The widget URI scheme draft is not scheduled for separate discussion, but 
it is listed as optional reading in preparation for the discussion [1] of 
naming.  If TAG members refer to it in discussion, then it will come up, 
otherwise not.  We don't at the F2F have a specific goal of responding to 
the widget: proposal. 

Actually, for the record, your email appears to refer to the editors' 
draft, while the agenda refers to the dated published copy that's current 
as of now. 

Noah

[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2009/06/23-agenda#naming

--------------------------------------
Noah Mendelsohn 
IBM Corporation
One Rogers Street
Cambridge, MA 02142
1-617-693-4036
--------------------------------------








Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
Sent by: www-tag-request@w3.org
06/20/2009 08:01 PM
 
        To:     Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
        cc:     www-tag <www-tag@w3.org>, (bcc: Noah 
Mendelsohn/Cambridge/IBM)
        Subject:        prefer to defer "widget:" discussion


The Widget URI scheme was also discussed on a mailing list
actually set up for the purpose 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pkg-uri-scheme/

And in reply to a comment I made, Robin produced:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pkg-uri-scheme/2009Jun/0000.html


I think the F2F agenda is pretty full, and that the document
produced:

http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-uri/

is an early draft. While there may well be architectural issues
that the TAG could discuss, I think they will be difficult to uncover
without more preparation, and suggest postponing TAG discussion 
on the topic.

Larry
Received on Monday, 22 June 2009 15:32:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:48:14 GMT