Reading the draft F2F minutes at [1] I'm reminded that one of the concerns we had about the draft we're considering publishing [2] is that its title is: "Usage Patterns For Client-Side URL parameters" and that throughout the text URL is used where URI might be more appropriate. I suggest that we change the title and the content to use "URI" prior to publication of the working draft. I suppose I would on balance be against changing url to uri in the URI itself: http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/hash-in-url.html, on the theory that cool uri's don't change. If someone wants to go to the trouble of setting up a redirect from http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/hash-in-url.html to http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/hash-in-uri.html and publishing the document there, I wouldn't be opposed. Probably not worth the hassle at this point. Noah [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2009/03/04-minutes.html#item02 [2] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/hash-in-url.html -------------------------------------- Noah Mendelsohn IBM Corporation One Rogers Street Cambridge, MA 02142 1-617-693-4036 --------------------------------------Received on Wednesday, 1 April 2009 22:27:02 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 1 April 2009 22:27:02 GMT