W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > September 2008

Re: rel=CURIE in RDFa, but rel=URI in Link:

From: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 12:58:33 +0200
To: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, "Shane McCarron" <shane@aptest.com>
Cc: "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>, "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>, "Jonathan Rees" <jar@creativecommons.org>, "www-tag@w3.org WG" <www-tag@w3.org>, "XHTML WG" <public-xhtml2@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.uiajfvlasmjzpq@acer3010.lan>

I forgot to comment on one other thing.

On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 14:35:22 +0200, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>  

> 2) The HTTP Link header draft suggests a IANA registry for "short"  
> relation names; the HTML5 spec currently suggests a Wiki (!), and the  
> XHTML2 WG seems to assume it can define these reserved words.

Actually, if you want to compare like with like here, the XHTML2 WG has  
grandfathered in existing defined values, but thinks that extensibility  
should not be via centralised repositories like a registry or a wiki, but  
via URIs, since this is the most scalable way.

Best wishes,

Received on Tuesday, 30 September 2008 10:59:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:32:58 UTC